Infrastructure decision · July 2026
TachiBot is a local MCP server — users run it themselves via npx with their own keys. Months 1–2 of the plan need zero infrastructure. A cloud version only enters at Month 3, as the hosted-tier skeleton — and even then, AWS is the wrong first platform.
Needs nothing: the open-source server (npx, local), directory listings, Sponsors/Polar, productized services, content. That's avenues 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 — the entire 90-day revenue plan runs on a landing page you already have.
Needs a cloud: only "TachiBot Cloud" (avenue 3) — the managed remote MCP server that holds keys and meters margin. And its Month-3 goal is a skeleton, not a launch: one small container, one database, a handful of test users.
Don't buy enterprise infrastructure for a proof-of-loop. A $10/mo box proves the same thing.
The purpose-built home for remote MCP in 2026: first-class remote-MCP support (McpAgent, built-in OAuth flows, Durable Objects for session state), generous free tier, zero server ops. Best match for "MCP server as a product".
$0–5 /mo · skeleton scale
If you'd rather keep the existing Node/FastMCP codebase untouched: one Docker container + managed Postgres, deploy from the repo in an afternoon. Slightly more ops than Workers, total code reuse.
$5–25 /mo · container + db
Justified only by: an enterprise client contractually requiring it, a compliance path (SOC 2), or real scale. Until then it buys you IAM, VPCs and ops burden — and nothing the skeleton needs.
defer · revisit at first enterprise deal
Step 1 · transport
TACHIBOT_TRANSPORT=http.the only real code change — everything else is packagingStep 2 · identity & keys
Step 3 · metering & safety
Step 4 · money & proof