Last updated: 2018-05-08

workflowr checks: (Click a bullet for more information)

• ✔ R Markdown file: up-to-date

  Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.

• ✔ Repository version: 77ce6c6

  Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility. The version displayed above was the version of the Git repository at the time these results were generated.
  
  Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:

  
  Ignored files:
      Ignored:    .Rhistory
      Ignored:    .Rproj.user/
      Ignored:    R/
      Ignored:    man/
  
  Unstaged changes:
      Deleted:    manuscript/review_protocol.Rmd
      Deleted:    manuscript/review_scoping.Rmd
  
  

  Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.

Expand here to see past versions:

File	Version	Author	Date	Message
Rmd	21434a4	egouldo	2018-05-08	add workflowr infrastructure

---

This website documents the quantitative literature review process for my PhD, from planning, to scoping, to analysis, inferencing and write-up.

---

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr 1.0.1

---