--- name: tdd description: > This skill should be used when the user asks to "add a feature using TDD", "fix a bug with TDD", "do TDD", "red-green-refactor", "write a failing test first", "use test-driven development", "start TDD", "test first approach", "TDD loop", "TDD cycle", or mentions TDD workflow, baby steps, guessing game, or red-green-refactor cycles. Not applicable for pure refactoring without new tests. --- # Test-Driven Development (TDD) Strict Red-Green-Refactor discipline for adding features and fixing bugs. This skill is language-agnostic; language-specific conventions are provided by separate skills. ## Core Process ### 1. Test List First Create a list of test cases for **base functionality only** before writing any implementation. Use the language's equivalent of pending/todo tests (e.g., `it.todo()`, `@Disabled`, `@Ignore`). Focus on core functionality, not advanced features. ### 2. Test List Approval After creating the test list, present it as markdown. Then, if the `human-in-the-loop` is not `off`, use `AskUserQuestion`: - **Question:** "Want to adjust the test list before we start?" - **Options:** - "Looks good, start" — proceed with the first test - "Add more tests" — wait for the user to specify additional tests ### 3. One Test at a Time Convert exactly **one** pending test to executable test code at a time. All other tests remain as pending descriptions. Never have more than one failing test in the red phase. Implement only what is needed to make that single test pass. Do not think ahead or implement features for future tests. ### 4. Red-Green-Refactor Cycle #### Red Phase (Compilation Error) 1. Write the test referencing a non-existent function/class. 2. Predict: "This will fail with a compilation error on ``." 3. Run — confirm compilation error, compare with prediction. #### Red Phase (Runtime Error) 1. Create an empty function/class returning a wrong value. 2. Predict: "This will fail with an assertion error — expected ``, got ``." 3. Run — confirm assertion error, compare with prediction. #### Green Phase 1. Predict: "This will pass after I implement ``." 2. Implement **minimal** code to make the test pass. Do not add features for future tests. Do not optimize or refactor yet. 3. Run — confirm green, compare with prediction. #### Refactor Phase **Must** attempt at least one refactoring. If no improvement is possible, document why. Trigger a **Clean Code Review**: use the Agent tool with `subagent_type=clean-code-reviewer` to spawn the clean code review agent. Pass it the paths of the implementation and test files modified in this TDD cycle. Present the agent's findings using the **Refactoring Scope** process from the Clean Code skill (present as markdown, then, if the `human-in-the-loop` is not `off`, ask via `AskUserQuestion`). Apply approved suggestions, ensuring all tests continue to pass after each change. **Naming evaluation (first priority):** - Ask: "Does this name clearly describe what the function actually does based on all tests so far?" - Ask: "Has the function's purpose become clearer/more specific through the latest test?" - Rename if the name does not capture the current full intent. Apply the 4 Rules of Simple Design: tests pass, no duplication, reveals intent, fewest elements. If no refactoring improves the code, document why the current state is optimal and move on. ### 5. Baby Steps Make the smallest possible change to get to green. If a test fails, make it pass with the simplest implementation. Do not try to solve multiple problems at once. ## Human-in-the-Loop Check the project's `.claude/tdder.local.md` settings file (in the project root) for the human-in-the-loop level. If no settings file exists, use `AskUserQuestion` to ask: - **Question:** "How much involvement do you want during TDD cycles?" - **Options:** - "Every phase (Recommended)" — stop after each Red, Green, Refactor phase - "End of cycle" — stop after each complete Red-Green-Refactor cycle - "Off" — run autonomously, report results at the end - Persist the choice in `.claude/tdder.local.md` so subsequent sessions reuse it. ### Level: `every-phase` Stop after **every TDD phase** (Red, Green, Refactor). Summarize what was completed and explicitly ask for permission to continue: - After Red: "Red phase complete. Should I proceed to Green phase?" - After Green: "Green phase complete. Should I proceed to Refactor phase?" - After Refactor: "Refactor phase complete. Should I proceed to the next test?" ### Level: `end-of-cycle` Stop after each **complete Red-Green-Refactor cycle**. Summarize the full cycle and ask: "Cycle complete. Should I proceed to the next test?" ### Level: `off` Run autonomously without stopping. Report results at the end. ### Failed Prediction Recovery Regardless of level, **immediately stop** when a guessing game prediction fails significantly. Explain the prediction failure, assess implications, and ask whether to investigate further or continue. ## Phase Summaries When stopping for human review, include: **After Red Phase:** - Which test was activated - Prediction made and whether it was correct - Type of failure achieved (compilation/runtime error) **After Green Phase:** - Implementation approach taken (minimal code added) - Confirmation that test now passes - Trade-offs or decisions made **After Refactor Phase:** - Naming changes made - Mass calculations (before/after, if APP skill is available) - Structural improvements - Refactoring opportunities rejected and why ## TDD Mindset TDD practices will feel counterintuitive and uncomfortable. This discomfort indicates the discipline is being followed correctly. For detailed analysis of psychological resistance, common failure modes, and recovery strategies, see `failure-modes.md`. ## Best Practices - One assertion per test when possible - Clear, descriptive test names - Tests should be independent (no shared state) - Start with the simplest possible implementation - Tests serve as documentation ## Additional Resources ### Reference Files For detailed guidance on specific aspects: - **`failure-modes.md`** - Detailed failure mode analysis and recovery strategies