# Jev-Gated Answer — answer, check groundedness with Jev, research more only if needed
# Usage: workflow({ name: "jev-gated-answer", query: "is SQLite WAL safe on NFS?" })
#
# Shows the Jev switch pattern: a jev_decide step returns calibrated JSON, and
# later steps branch on it with `condition.if` (dotted path + comparison):
#   if: "gate.answers.grounded.noul < 0.6"
# A false `if` skips the step. Jev costs ~$0.00002/call and answers in <1s.
#
# Models used: Perplexity (answer), Jev (gate), Grok (extra research), Gemini (revise)

name: jev-gated-answer
description: "Perplexity answer → Jev groundedness gate → (only if weak) Grok research + Gemini revision"
version: "1.0"

steps:
  - name: answer
    tool: perplexity_ask
    input:
      query: "${query}"
    maxTokens: 3000
    output:
      variable: first_answer

  - name: gate
    tool: jev_decide
    input:
      state: "QUESTION:\n${query}\n\nANSWER:\n${first_answer}"
      questions:
        grounded:
          type: noul
          instructions: "Is every key claim in the answer supported by a cited source or by evidence stated in the answer itself?"
        complete:
          type: score
          instructions: "How completely does the answer address the question?"
          criteria: ["partial", "mostly", "complete"]
    output:
      variable: gate_result

  # Runs only when Jev doubts the answer is grounded.
  - name: extra-research
    tool: grok_search
    condition:
      if: "gate.answers.grounded.noul < 0.6"
    input:
      query: "${query}"
      recency: "month"
    maxTokens: 4000
    output:
      variable: extra_evidence

  - name: revise
    tool: gemini_analyze_text
    condition:
      if: "gate.answers.grounded.noul < 0.6"
    input:
      text: "Revise this answer using the new evidence. Correct or cut a claim ONLY if the new evidence CONTRADICTS it. A claim the new evidence merely does not mention stays, marked [unconfirmed by second search]. If the new evidence found nothing at all, return the original answer unchanged with a one-line note saying so — absence of evidence is not contradiction.\n\nQUESTION:\n${query}\n\nORIGINAL ANSWER:\n${first_answer}\n\nNEW EVIDENCE:\n${extra_evidence}"
    maxTokens: 3000
    output:
      variable: revised_answer