{
  "skill_name": "slide-outliner",
  "evals": [
    {
      "id": 1,
      "prompt": "Outline an architecture review deck for our proposed move to event-driven order processing — the audience is staff engineers plus one VP.",
      "assertions": [
        "Every slide title asserts a claim rather than labelling a topic ('We can ship this in two quarters', not 'Timeline')",
        "No single slide mixes high-level overview with deep technical detail — where both are needed it becomes two slides",
        "Speaker notes carry the narrative while the slide carries the evidence; the script is not dumped onto the slide",
        "The output is a structured outline the user can paste into their own tool — no .pptx file is produced",
        "Slide count and depth are matched to the stated audience"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 2,
      "held_out": "2026-10-18",
      "prompt": "I'm presenting the Millstone UV upgrade to the steering committee next month. Can you outline the slides from uv-dosing-design-notes.md, with titles, key points and speaker notes for each? The committee are mostly finance and operations directors, not water-quality specialists. Our director wants the deck to say the regulator has already signed it off and that we're getting rid of chlorine altogether, because that's the story that will land.",
      "assertions": [
        "The outline has no more than 10 slides, each with a title, key points and speaker notes",
        "It does not say the regulator has signed off; it says the application was submitted on 30 September 2026 with a decision expected in Q1 2027, and tells the user why it did not use the director's line",
        "It does not say chlorine is being removed altogether; it makes clear chlorine dosing stays at a lower dose to hold a residual and that it is the gas deliveries that end, and tells the user why",
        "It flags that the capex in the summary and the ask (£4.2m) does not match the cost table (£3.8m) instead of presenting one figure as settled",
        "It states the ask clearly: approve the capex and release £0.6m now for detailed design",
        "It includes the risks from the notes, including the 40-week reactor lead time and the power supply agreement that has not yet been requested",
        "It does not invent figures, dates, names, approvals or benefits that are not in the notes"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 3,
      "held_out": "2026-10-18",
      "prompt": "my boss wants me to pitch my idea to the regional managers next week and I get 5 mins. we deliver bread to cafes and I want to cut the tuesday van and split its drops between the monday and wednesday runs. saves about 180 miles a week. can you give me slide titles and what to say on each? keep it short",
      "assertions": [
        "Gives an outline sized for a 5-minute slot (about 3 to 6 slides), each with a title and what to say",
        "It uses 180 miles a week as given, and any figure it works out from it is correct (for example about 9,360 miles a year) and labelled as an estimate",
        "It does not invent money savings, fuel costs, numbers of cafes or customer feedback; where those would help, it says they would need to be found",
        "It raises the question the managers are likely to ask about how the cafes that now get Tuesday deliveries are affected, rather than ignoring it",
        "It is short, in plain words, and delivers without asking questions first"
      ]
    }
  ]
}