{
  "name": "devils-advocate",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "description": "Adversarial review of just-generated code, run *after* an agent (or human) declares a feature done. Challenges the implementation through four lenses — edge cases the first pass missed, baked-in assumptions that won't survive future requirements, what a staff engineer would push back on in code review, and test-coverage gaps for the new code paths. Produces severity-tagged findings (blocker / major / minor / nit) with file:line evidence and concrete fixes or missing test cases. Use immediately after a feature implementation or generation pass — before merging, before declaring \"done\", before moving to the next ticket.",
  "entrypoint": "SKILL.md",
  "deps": { "npm": [], "pip": [] },
  "env": { "required": [], "optional": [] },
  "related": ["design-doc", "doc-critique"],
  "hooks": [
    { "event": "pre-commit-review", "action": "devils-advocate", "description": "adversarially review staged changes before they land" }
  ],
  "tags": ["review", "code-review", "adversarial", "edge-cases", "future-proofing", "test-coverage", "dev-workflow"],
  "model": { "tier": "heavy", "rationale": "Adversarial code review across four lenses. Cheaper models miss edge cases and under-call severity. Never downgrade." }
}