/**
 * The Critique contract — the structured result the Critic (Slice 2) produces
 * from one Team's Slice-1 evaluation. This is what the CLI prints and what the
 * Slice-3 Designer will reuse to name and explain what it discovers.
 */
import type { StrengthRow } from '../types.js';
export type Severity = 'high' | 'medium' | 'low';
/** One matchup hole or structural weakness, tied to what exploits it. */
export interface CritiqueWeakness {
    /** One-line statement of the weakness. */
    summary: string;
    /** Archetype label(s) that exploit it (matching the Gauntlet's labels). */
    exploitedBy: string[];
    /** Why it happens — the threat plus what the Team lacks. */
    mechanism: string;
    severity: Severity;
}
/** A concrete, actionable change to shore up a weakness. */
export interface CritiqueFix {
    change: string;
    rationale: string;
}
/** The full critique of one Team. */
export interface Critique {
    team: string;
    /** Overall Strength echoed from the evaluation, in [0, 1]. */
    strength: number;
    /** Plain-language summary of the Team's biggest problems. */
    overall: string;
    /** Ranked weaknesses, most severe first. */
    weaknesses: CritiqueWeakness[];
    fixes: CritiqueFix[];
    /** Caveats the Critic flagged — notably where a verdict leans on the Pilot's
     *  known offense bias (ADR 0004). */
    caveats: string[];
    /** Optional full legal Showdown paste with the fixes applied. */
    revisedPaste?: string;
    /** Which model produced the critique (for reproducibility). */
    model: string;
    /** Gauntlet version and seed of the underlying evaluation. */
    gauntletVersion?: string;
    seed: string;
}
/** Input to {@link critique}: one Team's paste plus its Slice-1 result. */
export interface CritiqueInput {
    /** Standard Showdown paste — lets the Critic reason about mechanism and fixes. */
    paste: string;
    /** That Team's row from an `evaluate()` result. */
    row: StrengthRow;
    seed: string;
    gauntletVersion?: string;
}