# DISABLED (#PR-319 FP cleanup): too noisy in script files
# 
# Original rule detected print() statements in Python, which is mostly a code-quality
# lint (print is fine in scripts, debug code, etc., but should be logger.info() in
# production code).
#
# PostHog validation showed 82% of fires (696/844) were in scripts/, commands/, and
# migrations/ directories where print() is the right tool. The rule doesn't respect
# # noqa: T201 suppressions (would require preprocessor pass on the source).
#
# Most legitimate production-code print() usage in pi-lens codebases is found by
# ruff T201 already — this rule duplicates that with worse signal-to-noise.
# Re-enable if a robust noqa-aware filter is added.

id: python-print-statement
name: Print Statement in Production
severity: warning
category: debugging
defect_class: safety
inline_tier: warning
language: python

message: "print() — remove debug output before committing"

description: |
  print() calls are for debugging and should not appear in production code.
  Use a proper logger instead.
  
  ✅ FIX: Remove or replace with logging.
    import logging
    logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
    logger.debug("value: %s", value)

query: |
  (call
    function: (identifier) @FUNC
    (#eq? @FUNC "print")
    arguments: (argument_list) @ARGS)

metavars:
  - FUNC
  - ARGS

post_filter: not_in_test_block

has_fix: true
fix_action: remove

tags:
  - debugging
  - code-quality

examples:
  bad: |
    def process(data):
        print("Processing:", data)
        result = transform(data)
        print("Result:", result)
        return result
  
  good: |
    import logging
    logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
    
    def process(data):
        logger.debug("Processing: %s", data)
        result = transform(data)
        logger.debug("Result: %s", result)
        return result