/** * BENCHMARK — the falsifiable proof that the brain is worth it: on a hidden response surface, does the * closed loop reach the optimum in FEWER experiments than random search and a systematic grid? Fewer * experiments is the entire value — each real experiment costs reagents, robot-time, money. Deterministic * + reproducible; the numbers are measured, not claimed. */ import { type Space, type Experiment } from "./space.js"; /** A multimodal surface with a global peak (≈1 at (7.2,3.4)) and a decoy local peak that traps naive search. */ export declare function multimodal(e: Experiment): number; export declare const benchSpace: Space; export interface BenchResult { brain: number | null; random: number; grid: number | null; target: number; budget: number; } /** Compare experiments-to-target for brain vs random (averaged over seeds) vs grid. Lower = better. */ export declare function benchmark(opts?: { budget?: number; target?: number; seeds?: number; }): Promise; /** A rugged Rastrigin-style surface (many local optima; global max 0 at (6.3,3.7)) — where single * greedy optimisers get trapped and the portfolio's diversity pays off. */ export declare function rugged(e: Experiment): number; export interface RobustnessRow { landscape: string; portfolio: number; kernelUcb: number; cmaes: number; resonance: number; random: number; portfolioIsBest: boolean; portfolioIsWorst: boolean; } /** Measure the portfolio vs each single arm across diverse landscapes (mean best over `seeds`). The * production thesis, falsifiable: the portfolio is never the worst and tracks the best arm per landscape — * and on the rugged surface the ensemble beats every single algorithm. */ export declare function robustnessBench(seeds?: number): Promise; export declare function benchGauntlet(): Promise<{ score: 0 | 100; checks: Array<{ name: string; pass: boolean; detail: string; }>; }>; //# sourceMappingURL=bench.d.ts.map