# KnowzCode - Operational Record

**Purpose:** Chronological record of significant events, decisions, and verification outcomes.

---

## Section 1: Operational Log

---
**[NEWEST ENTRIES APPEAR HERE - DO NOT REMOVE THIS MARKER]**
---
**Type:** ARC-Completion-Correction
**Timestamp:** 2026-07-30 22:45:21 EDT
**WorkGroupID:** kc-fix-context-orchestration-hardening-20260731-003258
**NodeID(s):** ContextEfficientOrchestration, ClaudeRuntimeCompatibility, CodexRuntimeParity
**Logged By:** AI-Agent (Codex lead, autonomous multi-agent hardening workflow)
**Details:**
- Supersedes the release-readiness conclusion recorded for `kc-feat-context-efficient-orchestration-20260730-035714`. Fresh adversarial review reopened the three nodes and produced runtime, workflow, installer, ownership, package, and crash-recovery fixes; the obsolete pending completion remains quarantined as `superseded`.
- Final formal verification is 66/66 criteria: CEO 21/21, CRC 25/25, and CRP 20/20. The executable runtime suite passes 32/32 contracts over a balanced 40-case corpus, with default rollout still `off` and synthetic evidence prohibited from live promotion.
- Lifecycle validation now covers exact Knowz/KnowzCode ownership, atomic preflight, project/HOME isolation, Claude plugin/local resource and namespace matrices, Copilot structural merges, both Gemini shared-custody orders, immutable co-owned updates, both uninstall orders, arbitrary unowned non-claim, malformed settings, and symmetric missing/replaced/leaf-/ancestor-symlinked interrupted-peer evidence.
- Final gates: platform validator PASS; mirror sync PASS (13 Codex skills + one generated reference, seven framework mirrors, three contracts); syntax/JSON/diff checks PASS; KnowzCode dry-run package 104 files and Knowz package 20 files PASS.
- Independent final audits scored 98/100 for workflow/resource/traceability and 100/100 for runtime/security/actual-packed behavior. Weighted release readiness is **98/100**, with no unresolved critical/high/medium/low finding.
- The final durable completion delta is queued once in project-root `knowz-pending.md` because no live Knowz MCP writer is callable in this environment.
---
**Type:** ARC-Completion
**Timestamp:** 2026-07-30 05:34:06 EDT
**WorkGroupID:** kc-feat-context-efficient-orchestration-20260730-035714
**NodeID(s):** ContextEfficientOrchestration, ClaudeRuntimeCompatibility, CodexRuntimeParity
**Logged By:** AI-Agent (Codex lead, autonomous multi-agent workflow)
**Details:**
- Formalized and shipped context-efficient orchestration for Claude and Codex: deterministic local/resume/inheritance/capsule/team routing, versioned capsules and lineage, progressive skill loading, bounded results, current Claude lifecycle semantics, canonical Codex distribution, redacted telemetry, lead-owned vault batching, and fail-closed rollout promotion.
- Independent audits iterated through all reported gaps. Final verification was 41/41 criteria (100%), with no unresolved critical/high/medium finding.
- Evidence: 20/20 contract tests, 40/40 executable corpus oracles across five balanced strata, platform/install/upgrade validator PASS, mirror sync PASS, 96-file package dry-run PASS, and `git diff --check` PASS.
- Repository fixtures remain non-empirical and cannot promote rollout. Default rollout is `off`; real paired provider measurements are required before observe/shadow/canary promotion.
- Knowz MCP was unavailable under the cached failed health probe; the consolidated Phase 3 completion delta was classified `flush / EXPLICIT_SAVE` and queued once in `knowzcode/pending_captures.md`.
---
**Type:** MicroFix
**Timestamp:** 2026-07-19 16:05:32 EDT
**NodeID(s)/File:** CrossAgentRelay / timeout and continuation protocol
**Logged By:** AI-Agent
**Details:**
- **User Request:** Raise the relay-agent default from 45 to 90 minutes and allow a useful continue-versus-resume conversation at the time boundary.
- **Action Taken:** Made 90 minutes the default decision horizon, expanded the Sonnet runner turn budget, and added a pre-deadline `continue-live` / `interrupt-and-resume` / `stop` dialogue with one evidence-based automatic extension.
- **Verification:** Default/mirror assertions, generated adapter synchronization, package dry-run, and platform-surface validation run after the update.
---
**Type:** MicroFix
**Timestamp:** 2026-07-19 15:59:35 EDT
**NodeID(s)/File:** CrossAgentRelay / relay-runner and relay execution guidance
**Logged By:** AI-Agent
**Details:**
- **User Request:** Give relay subagents filtered live Codex output or periodic progress updates.
- **Action Taken:** Added a one-minute, bounded `PROGRESS_COMMAND` bridge, a Codex JSONL summary selector, lead-only progress delivery, and untrusted-telemetry safeguards.
- **Verification:** Relay mirror synchronization and platform-surface validation run after the update.
---
**Type:** Exploration-Deferred
**Timestamp:** 2026-04-19 12:35:00
**Topic:** Tree-sitter / code-graph fit for knowz vs knowzcode
**Logged By:** AI-Agent (kc-explore-tree-sitter-knowz, Planning mode)
**Details:**
Explored integrating a tree-sitter / code-graph capability into knowz or knowzcode. Team (knowledge-liaison, analyst, architect, reviewer) unanimously concluded: knowzcode is the correct integration surface (knowz would violate its curated-knowledge charter and create PII leakage risk). Recommended path is Option 1 — adopt Serena or compatible symbol-aware MCP as an optional ecosystem dependency, with detection probe + graceful fallback in analyst/scanner agents. User elected **Option 3 (defer)**: log as evaluated, revisit if demand materializes.

Key premise correction captured in plan: tree-sitter alone doesn't monitor or save tokens — that's Aider's repo-map (tree-sitter + PageRank) or Serena (LSP-based). Realistic savings are 20–40% on Stage 0 discovery for repos >200 files, not blanket.

Artifacts:
- `knowzcode/planning/tree-sitter-knowz-fit.md` — full plan with 3 options, NodeID breakdown, risk table.

MCP note: vault capture queued to `knowzcode/pending_captures.md` (MCP auth failed at probe — 401). Run `/knowz flush` after API key refresh.
---
**Type:** ARC-Completion
**Timestamp:** 2026-04-18 13:28:17
**WorkGroupID:** kc-fix-server-side-summary-20260418-132817
**NodeID(s):** ServerSideSummary
**Logged By:** AI-Agent (lead-direct, Tier 2 Light)
**Details:**
Documented three Knowz-platform server-side summary defects as a formal spec mirroring the `ServerSideTitle` delegation pattern.

- Defect 1 — groundedness gap: summarizer fabricates themes/characters/quotes/life-lessons from thin input (example: "Here's a book I like" + still-indexing PDF produced a multi-section narrative about a favorite book's life lessons).
- Defect 2 — indexing-state blindness: preliminary summary generated while attachment still indexing, rendered authoritative with no provenance label.
- Defect 3 — post-processing refresh gap: summary NOT auto-regenerated after attachment indexing completes; user had to manually click "Resummarize".

Deliverables:
- `knowzcode/knowzcode/specs/ServerSideSummary.md` (new, Draft) — platform contract with groundedness, indexing-state gating, refresh, and provenance rules + VERIFY criteria.
- `knowzcode/planning/server-side-summary.md` (new) — planning record.
- `knowzcode/workgroups/kc-fix-server-side-summary-20260418-132817.md` (new) — WorkGroup file.

Scope note: platform-side implementation is out of repo scope. Spec exists to make the debt visible and give the platform team a verifiable target.

MCP note: vault capture queued to `knowzcode/pending_captures.md` (MCP auth failed at probe — 401, API key invalid/expired). Run `/knowz flush` after API key is refreshed.
---
**Type:** SystemInitialization
**Timestamp:** 2026-03-08 16:05:30
**NodeID(s):** Project-Wide
**Logged By:** knowzcode-cli
**Details:**
KnowzCode framework installed via `npx knowzcode`.
- Framework files initialized
- Ready for first feature
---

## Section 2: Reference Quality Criteria (ARC-Based Verification)

### Core Quality Criteria
1.  **Maintainability:** Ease of modification, clarity of code and design.
2.  **Reliability:** Robustness of error handling, fault tolerance.
3.  **Testability:** Adequacy of unit test coverage, ease of testing.
4.  **Performance:** Responsiveness, efficiency in resource utilization.
5.  **Security:** Resistance to common vulnerabilities.

### Structural Criteria
6.  **Readability:** Code clarity, adherence to naming conventions.
7.  **Complexity Management:** Avoidance of overly complex logic.
8.  **Modularity:** Adherence to Single Responsibility Principle.
9.  **Code Duplication (DRY):** Minimization of redundant code.
10. **Standards Compliance:** Adherence to language best practices.

*(Refer to these criteria during ARC-Based Verification.)*