# CSS strategy

* Status: **accepted**
* Deciders: @shawnbot @JimBrodbeck @nlsfds
* Date: 2022-04-21 <!-- when the decision was last updated -->

## Context and problem statement

Our form.io components are heavily reliant on global CSS on sf.gov. There are actually three separate projects (repos) at play here:

1. [formio-sfds](https://github.com/SFDigitalServices/formio-sfds) (this repo)
2. [design-system](https://github.com/SFDigitalServices/design-system)
3. [sfgov](https://github.com/SFDigitalServices/sfgov)

In order to move [DESSYS-155](https://sfgovdt.jira.com/browse/DESSYS-155) forward, we need to make a decision about how the three repos are connected.

## Decision drivers <!-- optional -->

* Time: we need to do this soon!
* Maintenance/developer experience: if it's hard to set up or test, that will slow us down
* Ease of use: does this decision make forms easier or harder to use?
* Embedding: do we need to consider the use case of forms embedded outside of SF.gov?

## Considered Options

* [Use global CSS](#use-global-css)
* [Import CSS from the design system](#import-css-from-the-design-system)

## Decision Outcome

We've chosen to [import CSS from the design system](#import-css-from-the-design-system).

This will allow us to move forward with form styles in parallel with SF.gov, rather than relying on them.

### Positive consequences <!-- optional -->

- Easier testing
- Easier to debug
- Embedding outside of SF.gov becomes easier

### Negative consequences <!-- optional -->

- Tricky to set up
- Introduces some duplicate CSS (mostly utilities scoped to forms)

## Pros and cons of the options <!-- optional -->

### Use global CSS

In this setup, we would rely (increasingly) on global CSS from SF.gov, which includes CSS (utility classes, etc.) from the design system:

```mermaid
graph LR
  A(sf.gov) -->|includes| B(sfgov-design-system)
  C(formio-sfds) -->|references| A
```

* Good, because it requires fewer changes on the formio-sfds side
* Bad, because it makes testing with design system updates more complicated
* Bad, because it increases the form.io theme's reliance on global CSS
* Bad, because it makes forms harder to embed outside of SF.gov

### Import CSS from the design system

In this setup, both SF.gov and formio-sfds would pull the CSS they need from the design system:

```mermaid
graph TD
  A(sf.gov) -->|includes| B(sfgov-design-system)
  C(formio-sfds) -->|includes| B
```

* Good, because SF.gov and the form system can decide what they need (and don't)
* Good, because it's easier to test
* Bad, because it opens up the possibilty of different versions of the design system coexisting on SF.gov
* Bad, because it includes some duplicate CSS on the front end