Darwin x64 - 13.3.0
-----

<table><tr><td><b>node</b></td><td><b>memory</b></td><td><b>cpu</b></td></tr><tr><td>v0.10.29</td><td>8.59 GB</td><td>Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500S CPU @ 2.70GHz</td></tr></table>

#### Benchmark Results ####

<table><tr><td><b>CoffeeScript comprehension</b></td><td>35,419 ops/sec ±16.91% (35 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>for loop (with function call)</b></td><td>38,041 ops/sec ±11.40% (37 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>Array#map</b></td><td>7,590 ops/sec ±10.86% (40 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>underscore#map</b></td><td>9,937 ops/sec ±7.38% (47 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>lodash#map</b></td><td>37,105 ops/sec ±5.73% (59 runs sampled)</td></tr></table>

> Notes:
> - Fastest is lodash#map,for loop (with function call),CoffeeScript comprehension

Linux x64 - 3.8.4-1-ARCH
-----

<table><tr><td><b>node</b></td><td><b>memory</b></td><td><b>cpu</b></td></tr><tr><td>v0.10.30</td><td>519 MB</td><td>QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.0</td></tr></table>

#### Benchmark Results ####

<table><tr><td><b>CoffeeScript comprehension</b></td><td>2,773 ops/sec ±2.50% (11 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>for loop (with function call)</b></td><td>2,759 ops/sec ±14.74% (13 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>Array#map</b></td><td>844 ops/sec ±7.22% (13 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>underscore#map</b></td><td>1,057 ops/sec ±6.97% (13 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>lodash#map</b></td><td>4,257 ops/sec ±4.98% (20 runs sampled)</td></tr></table>

> Notes:
> - Fastest is lodash#map

Linux x64 - 3.13.0-34-generic
-----

<table><tr><td><b>node</b></td><td><b>memory</b></td><td><b>cpu</b></td></tr><tr><td>v0.10.29</td><td>8.30 GB</td><td>Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4200M CPU @ 2.50GHz</td></tr></table>

#### Benchmark Results ####

<table><tr><td><b>CoffeeScript comprehension</b></td><td>25,414 ops/sec ±18.40% (29 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>for loop (with function call)</b></td><td>21,676 ops/sec ±13.46% (28 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>Array#map</b></td><td>4,693 ops/sec ±12.94% (28 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>underscore#map</b></td><td>6,770 ops/sec ±10.48% (37 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>lodash#map</b></td><td>29,264 ops/sec ±8.86% (53 runs sampled)</td></tr></table>

> Notes:
> - Fastest is lodash#map,CoffeeScript comprehension

Darwin x64 - 13.2.0
-----

<table><tr><td><b>node</b></td><td><b>memory</b></td><td><b>cpu</b></td></tr><tr><td>v0.11.13</td><td>4.29 GB</td><td>Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3615QM CPU @ 2.30GHz</td></tr></table>

#### Benchmark Results ####

<table><tr><td><b>CoffeeScript comprehension</b></td><td>54,031 ops/sec ±11.05% (43 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>for loop (with function call)</b></td><td>56,617 ops/sec ±8.42% (46 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>Array#map</b></td><td>7,428 ops/sec ±7.36% (50 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>underscore#map</b></td><td>9,554 ops/sec ±5.74% (53 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>lodash#map</b></td><td>123,316 ops/sec ±4.19% (79 runs sampled)</td></tr></table>

> Notes:
> - Fastest is lodash#map

Darwin x64 - 13.3.0
-----

<table><tr><td><b>node</b></td><td><b>memory</b></td><td><b>cpu</b></td></tr><tr><td>v0.11.13</td><td>8.59 GB</td><td>Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500S CPU @ 2.70GHz</td></tr></table>

#### Benchmark Results ####

<table><tr><td><b>CoffeeScript comprehension</b></td><td>31,861 ops/sec ±8.77% (25 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>for loop (with function call)</b></td><td>33,644 ops/sec ±12.71% (26 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>Array#map</b></td><td>5,550 ops/sec ±9.94% (35 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>underscore#map</b></td><td>7,188 ops/sec ±7.87% (39 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>lodash#map</b></td><td>80,318 ops/sec ±5.12% (56 runs sampled)</td></tr></table>

> Notes:
> - Fastest is lodash#map

Darwin x64 - 13.3.0
-----

<table><tr><td><b>node</b></td><td><b>memory</b></td><td><b>cpu</b></td></tr><tr><td>v0.10.31</td><td>8.59 GB</td><td>Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500S CPU @ 2.70GHz</td></tr></table>

#### Benchmark Results ####

<table><tr><td><b>CoffeeScript comprehension</b></td><td>32,951 ops/sec ±19.72% (30 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>for loop (with function call)</b></td><td>31,687 ops/sec ±15.78% (29 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>Array#map</b></td><td>6,845 ops/sec ±16.09% (35 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>underscore#map</b></td><td>9,901 ops/sec ±15.25% (44 runs sampled)</td></tr><tr><td><b>lodash#map</b></td><td>43,147 ops/sec ±5.11% (77 runs sampled)</td></tr></table>

> Notes:
> - Fastest is lodash#map