# Verification

## Mode
- `greenfield-spec`

## Checkpoint Summary
- discovery checkpoint: `PASS`
- spec checkpoint: `PASS`
- design checkpoint: `PASS`
- mapping checkpoint: `PASS`
- task checkpoint: `PASS`
- execution checkpoint: `PASS`

## Requirement Coverage
- homepage explains the three core capabilities
- homepage positions the product as desktop-software-oriented
- homepage links to the workflow detail page
- product detail page explains import, annotate, and publish flow
- product detail page explains desktop workspace modules

## Design Coverage
- the homepage implementation follows the Pencil screen structure for hero, capabilities, MCP service, and CTA
- the product detail implementation follows the Pencil screen structure for workspace hero, pipeline, modules, and CTA
- implementation pages are explicitly bound to Pencil screen ids

## Drift Findings
- no blocking requirement drift recorded in this forward test
- no blocking design drift recorded in this forward test

## Known Gaps
- the `.pen` file is not yet committed into the repository
- the implementation is static `HTML + Tailwind`, not a production componentized application
- mobile behavior is acceptable for a launch-page example but was not the design priority

## Conclusion
- Da Vinci successfully ran the `greenfield-spec` flow from product description to Pencil-backed static implementation
- the example demonstrates that requirements, Pencil bindings, tasks, and code outputs can stay aligned in one repository