tools:
  - name: structuredArgumentation
    description: >-
      A detailed tool for systematic dialectical reasoning and argument
      analysis.

      This tool helps analyze complex questions through formal argumentation
      structures.

      It facilitates the creation, critique, and synthesis of competing
      arguments.


      When to use this tool:

      - Evaluating competing perspectives and claims

      - Analyzing complex ethical dilemmas

      - Assessing policy proposals with multiple stakeholders

      - Exploring scientific hypotheses and counter-arguments


      Key features:

      - Break down arguments into claims, premises, and conclusions

      - Track relationships between arguments

      - Represent objections and rebuttals

      - Facilitate dialectical progression through thesis-antithesis-synthesis

      - Evaluate argument strengths and weaknesses

      - Visualize argument structures


      Parameters explained:

      - claim: The central proposition being argued

      - premises: Supporting evidence or assumptions

      - conclusion: The logical consequence of accepting the claim

      - argumentType: Whether this is a thesis, antithesis, synthesis,
      objection, or rebuttal

      - confidence: Your confidence level in this argument (0.0-1.0)

      - respondsTo: ID of an argument this directly responds to

      - supports/contradicts: IDs of arguments this supports or contradicts

      - strengths/weaknesses: Notable strong or weak points of the argument

      - nextArgumentNeeded: Whether another argument is needed in the dialectic
    inputSchema:
      type: object
      required:
        - claim
        - premises
        - conclusion
        - argumentType
        - confidence
        - nextArgumentNeeded
      properties:
        claim:
          type: string
          description: The central proposition being argued
        premises:
          type: array
          items:
            type: string
          description: Supporting evidence or assumptions
        supports:
          type: array
          items:
            type: string
          description: IDs of arguments this supports
        strengths:
          type: array
          items:
            type: string
          description: Notable strong points of the argument
        argumentId:
          type: string
          description: Optional unique identifier for this argument
        conclusion:
          type: string
          description: The logical consequence of accepting the claim
        confidence:
          type: number
          maximum: 1
          minimum: 0
          description: Confidence level in this argument (0.0-1.0)
        respondsTo:
          type: string
          description: ID of the argument this directly responds to
        weaknesses:
          type: array
          items:
            type: string
          description: Notable weak points of the argument
        contradicts:
          type: array
          items:
            type: string
          description: IDs of arguments this contradicts
        argumentType:
          enum:
            - thesis
            - antithesis
            - synthesis
            - objection
            - rebuttal
          type: string
          description: The type of argument being presented
        nextArgumentNeeded:
          type: boolean
          description: Whether another argument is needed in the dialectic
        suggestedNextTypes:
          type: array
          items:
            enum:
              - thesis
              - antithesis
              - synthesis
              - objection
              - rebuttal
            type: string
          description: Suggested types for the next argument