/**
 * EvaluatorRunner — Peer runner for principle evaluation (PRI-67).
 *
 * Migrated to extend BasePeerRunner (PRI-302). The shared lease → buildContext →
 * invoke → poll → fetch → validate → succeed/fail pipeline is now in the base
 * class. This file only contains Evaluator-specific logic.
 *
 * Key business semantics:
 *   - Evaluator approved → must validate the principle-bearing Scribe artifact,
 *     NOT the Artificer plan artifact. This is the critical lineage contract.
 *   - resolvePrincipleBearerArtifact uses sourceTrace.scribeArtifactId first,
 *     then falls back to lineage search. Ambiguous candidates → fail loud.
 *   - updateValidationStatus returning false → structured telemetry, no silent skip.
 *
 * ERR considerations:
 *   - ERR-001 / ERR-005: output is `unknown` until validateOutput passes.
 *   - ERR-004 / ERR-008: sourceTrace / scribeArtifactId / sourceArtificerArtifactId
 *     must be internally consistent.
 *   - ERR-018 / ERR-019: validationStatus update target must be the correct
 *     principle-bearing artifact, never stale or wrong.
 *   - ERR-025: tests must exercise real evaluator runner path.
 *   - ERR-048: activation write/read path must not break.
 *
 * @see docs/adr/0003-peer-agent-state-machine-orchestration.md
 * @see BasePeerRunner in runner/base-peer-runner.ts
 */
import type { RunHandle } from '../runtime-protocol.js';
import type { EvaluatorOutputV1, EvaluatorValidator } from './evaluator-output.js';
import type { TaskRecord } from '../task-status.js';
import { type PDErrorCategory } from '../error-categories.js';
import { type RepairPayload } from './pitask-metadata.js';
import { type PreviousEvaluationContext, type HostToolCatalogFacts } from './evaluator-prompt-builder.js';
import type { FormationContext } from './formation-context.js';
import type { ArtificerHostSemanticContext } from './artificer-prompt-builder.js';
import { type InternalizationChannel, type PipelineTopologyMode, type ArtifactRef } from './peer-runner-contracts.js';
import { BasePeerRunner } from '../runner/base-peer-runner.js';
import type { PeerRunnerOptions, PeerRunnerDeps, PeerRunnerResult, PeerRunnerValidationResult } from '../runner/peer-runner-types.js';
import type { EffectivePdConfig } from '../config/pd-config-types.js';
import type { OutputLanguage } from '../language-directive.js';
import { type RefinerRuleHostGateDeps } from './refiner-rulehost-gate.js';
/** Context built by EvaluatorRunner.buildContext() and consumed by invokeRuntime(). */
interface EvaluatorContext {
    readonly contextHash: string;
    readonly artificerArtifact: string | null;
    readonly sourceArtificerArtifactId: string | null;
    /**
     * Scribe principle artifact contentJson (RuleHost MVP Activation, PRD Decision 12).
     * Loaded so the evaluator LLM can judge code intentConsistency/scopePrecision
     * against the original principle text. Null when no scribe artifact is resolvable
     * (scribeArtifactId missing/malformed or upstream artifact unavailable).
     */
    readonly scribeArtifact: string | null;
    readonly sourceScribeArtifactId: string | null;
    /**
     * PRI-630 收敛契约: 依赖 artificer 的 repairPayload (第 2+ 轮存在)。
     * 派生 previousEvaluation 注入 prompt — 上轮 decision/score/concerns/
     * requiredChanges(稳定 id)/repairIteration。
     */
    readonly dependencyRepairPayload?: RepairPayload;
    /** PRI-630: 由 dependencyRepairPayload 解析的上轮评估上下文 (首轮 undefined) */
    readonly previousEvaluation?: PreviousEvaluationContext;
    /**
     * PRI-843 (DC-4a): bounded formation-evidence projection (dreamer proposals +
     * source diagnosis + provenance) resolved from the scribe artifact's
     * authoritative `sourceTrace.dreamerArtifactId`. Undefined when the lineage id
     * is absent or the formation cannot be resolved — the prompt then keeps its
     * pre-PRI-843 shape exactly (legacy / degraded compatibility).
     */
    readonly formationContext?: FormationContext;
}
export type EvaluatorRunnerResultStatus = 'succeeded' | 'failed' | 'retried';
export interface EvaluatorRunnerResult {
    readonly status: EvaluatorRunnerResultStatus;
    readonly taskId: string;
    readonly runId?: string;
    readonly artifactId?: string;
    readonly resultRef?: string;
    readonly contextHash?: string;
    readonly output?: EvaluatorOutputV1;
    readonly errorCategory?: PDErrorCategory;
    readonly failureReason?: string;
    readonly attemptCount: number;
}
/**
 * EvaluatorRunner options. Extends PeerRunnerOptions with an optional
 * RuleHost sandbox gate deps (PRI-426). When `gateDeps` is provided AND the
 * evaluator output is V2 (code-bearing), succeedTask runs a single-round
 * adversarial sandbox replay and populates `adversarialResult`.
 *
 * When `gateDeps` is absent, V2 outputs still validate but no replay runs —
 * this preserves backward compatibility for callers not yet wired to the
 * sandbox (e.g. V1-only test fixtures, pre-Phase-6 assembly).
 */
export interface EvaluatorRunnerOptions extends PeerRunnerOptions {
    readonly gateDeps?: RefinerRuleHostGateDeps;
    /**
     * PRI-630 工具目录权威: runtime-authoritative host tool facts (readOnly /
     * write 工具名)。由宿主装配层注入;缺失时 prompt 声明 degraded 规则 —
     * 工具名差异不得成为 hard blocker。
     */
    readonly hostToolCatalog?: HostToolCatalogFacts;
    /**
     * PRI-741: host semantic projection (real host tool names + kinds from the
     * SAME registry provenance as gateDeps). Used ONLY to generate the
     * host-name parity replay case — the prompt itself is unchanged. Undefined =
     * no host-alias case is generated (observable skip event).
     */
    readonly hostSemanticContext?: ArtificerHostSemanticContext;
    /**
     * PR B (ADR-0019 pattern, mirrors ArtificerRunner): effective config for
     * feature flag resolution (e.g. the repair-loop and degradation flags).
     */
    readonly effectiveConfig?: EffectivePdConfig;
}
export interface ResolvedEvaluatorRunnerOptions {
    readonly pollIntervalMs: number;
    readonly timeoutMs: number;
    readonly defaultMaxAttempts: number;
    readonly owner: string;
    readonly runtimeKind: string;
    readonly agentId: string;
    /**
     * Owner's preferred language for review fields (PRI-714). Forwarded to
     * EvaluatorPromptBuilder so summary/concerns/requiredChanges/codeReview
     * explanations follow the owner's language. Undefined = no directive
     * (backward compatible).
     */
    readonly outputLanguage?: OutputLanguage;
}
export declare const DEFAULT_EVALUATOR_RUNNER_OPTIONS: Readonly<Omit<ResolvedEvaluatorRunnerOptions, 'owner' | 'runtimeKind'>>;
export declare function resolveEvaluatorRunnerOptions(options: EvaluatorRunnerOptions): ResolvedEvaluatorRunnerOptions;
/**
 * PRI-509: Parameters for seeding an artificer repair task.
 *
 * The evaluator runner constructs the repairPayload (core logic — 6 fields
 * sourced from the current evaluator output) and resolves inherited lineage
 * from the dependency artificer task. The actual task record creation is
 * delegated to the plugin layer via `seedArtificerRepairTask` to preserve
 * the core/plugin boundary (core peer runners do NOT directly orchestrate
 * task creation — enforced by architecture-regression.test.ts).
 */
export interface SeedArtificerRepairParams {
    /** The repair payload (6 fields) constructed by the evaluator runner. */
    readonly repairPayload: RepairPayload;
    /** Scribe task IDs inherited from the original artificer task. */
    readonly inheritedDependencyTaskIds: readonly string[];
    /** Channel inherited from the original artificer task. */
    readonly inheritedChannel: InternalizationChannel;
    /** PRI-720: topology mode inherited from the original artificer task (full_chain override). */
    readonly inheritedPipelineMode?: PipelineTopologyMode;
    /** Timeout inherited from the original artificer task. */
    readonly inheritedTimeoutMs: number;
    /** Input artifact refs inherited from the original artificer task. */
    readonly inheritedInputArtifactRefs: readonly ArtifactRef[];
}
export interface EvaluatorRunnerDeps extends PeerRunnerDeps {
    readonly validator: EvaluatorValidator;
    /**
     * PRI-509: feature flag resolver for the evaluator→artificer repair loop.
     * When omitted or returns false, evaluator needs_revision follows the
     * legacy path (no repair task seeded). When returns true and the
     * decision is needs_revision, the evaluator seeds an artificer repair
     * task (up to 2 rounds) or marks the task needs_human_review on the
     * 3rd round (fail loud, EP-03).
     *
     * Injected by the plugin layer (which reads EffectivePdConfig); core
     * stays pure logic with no direct config coupling (D5).
     */
    readonly isRepairLoopEnabled?: () => boolean;
    /**
     * PRI-509: Seeder function for artificer repair tasks.
     *
     * The plugin layer implements this by serializing the repairPayload +
     * inherited metadata into diagnosticJson and calling stateManager
     * task-creation. Core peer runners must NOT call task-creation directly
     * (architecture-regression.test.ts enforces this boundary).
     *
     * Returns the newly created repair task's ID.
     */
    readonly seedArtificerRepairTask?: (params: SeedArtificerRepairParams) => Promise<string>;
}
export declare class EvaluatorRunner extends BasePeerRunner<EvaluatorContext, EvaluatorOutputV1> {
    private readonly validator;
    /**
     * Optional RuleHost sandbox gate deps (PRI-426). When present and the output
     * is V2, succeedTask runs a single adversarial sandbox replay. Absent = no
     * replay (backward compatible).
     */
    private readonly gateDeps;
    /**
     * PRI-509: feature flag resolver for the evaluator→artificer repair loop.
     * Null when the deps did not inject the resolver (= disabled, legacy path).
     */
    private readonly repairLoopEnabledResolver;
    /**
     * PRI-509: seeder function for artificer repair tasks.
     * Null when the deps did not inject the seeder (= repair seeding unavailable).
     */
    private readonly repairTaskSeeder;
    /** PRI-630: runtime-authoritative tool facts; null = catalog unavailable (degraded rule in prompt) */
    private readonly hostToolCatalog;
    /** PRI-741: host semantic projection for the host-name parity replay case; null = skipped. */
    private readonly hostSemanticContext;
    /**
     * PRI-714: owner's preferred language for review fields, forwarded into
     * the evaluator prompt (language directive on summary/concerns/…).
     * Undefined = no directive (backward compatible).
     */
    private readonly outputLanguage;
    constructor(deps: EvaluatorRunnerDeps, options: EvaluatorRunnerOptions);
    /**
     * Returns true iff the evaluator→artificer repair loop feature flag is on.
     */
    private isRepairLoopEnabled;
    get permanentErrorCategories(): ReadonlySet<PDErrorCategory>;
    buildContext(taskId: string): Promise<EvaluatorContext>;
    invokeRuntime(taskId: string, context: EvaluatorContext): Promise<RunHandle>;
    /**
     * PRI-843: narrow task view for formation-context resolution (the scribe
     * adapter, verbatim): phase identity lives on the task row, never on the
     * artifact, so the diagnostic predecessor can only be found via task lookup.
     */
    private lookupFormationTask;
    /**
     * PRI-630 收敛契约 (SPEC §18.1): 解析上轮评估上下文 — 从 dependency
     * artificer 的 repairPayload.sourceEvaluatorTaskId 找到上轮 evaluator,
     * 读取其最近 principle artifact,按 rc-1/rc-2 守卫解析 evaluation 字段。
     * requirements 用稳定 id (req-1..N, 上轮 requiredChanges 顺序)。
     * 解析失败 → 结构化降级事件 + undefined (保持既有行为,可观测)。
     */
    private resolvePreviousEvaluation;
    /**
     * Build the evaluator prompt from the full predecessor artifacts.
     */
    private buildEvaluatorPrompt;
    validateOutput(output: unknown, taskId: string, context: EvaluatorContext): Promise<PeerRunnerValidationResult>;
    succeedTask(taskId: string, runId: string, output: EvaluatorOutputV1, task: TaskRecord, contextHash: string, context: EvaluatorContext): Promise<PeerRunnerResult<EvaluatorOutputV1>>;
    /**
     * P0 (verdict drift): 执行 decision 的治理效果 (fresh 与 resume 共用,
     * 幂等): approved → validate principle bearer;needs_revision (repair loop
     * on) → deterministic repair seed / max-iterations needs_human_review;
     * rejected → 无效果。
     *
     * 返回非 null = terminal 结果 (needs_human_review 族,caller 直接返回,
     * 不得 markTaskSucceeded);null = effects 完成,caller 标 intent applied
     * 后 markSucceeded。
     */
    private applyEvaluatorDecisionEffects;
    /**
     * PRI-703 Phase 2: extract failed replay caseIds from the evaluator output.
     * Trust-boundary (rc-1/rc-4): adversarialResult.failedCases is untrusted
     * artifact content — validate each element's caseId shape; malformed entries
     * are skipped (they cannot inform scoping decisions).
     */
    private static extractFailedCases;
    /**
     * PRI-703 Phase 2: resolve the rule's requiresContextVersion from the
     * DURABLE artificer artifact (never from the LLM-forgible evaluator copy).
     * Three-way result (see resolveRequiresContextVersionFromArtifact):
     *   2 / undefined → resolved (v2 / v1) — the scope partition MUST run;
     *   null → unresolvable (attribution stays inconclusive — fail-open to the
     *          existing repair path, never blocks the loop on a read error).
     *
     * 评审 P1 修正：key-absent on a PARSED artifact is deterministically v1
     * (artificer schema only ever writes literal 2) and must reach the
     * partition — collapsing it into null made the out-of-scope routing
     * unreachable in production for exactly its target population (v1 rules).
     */
    private resolveRequiresContextVersion;
    /**
     * PRI-509: Resolve the prior repair iteration by reading the dependency
     * artificer task's repairPayload (rc-7: written at task creation, never
     * inferred at read). Returns 0 when the dependency artificer has no
     * repairPayload (Round-1 evaluator → first repair).
     *
     * Loop state freshness (EP-05, ERR-015/018/019): each evaluator round reads
     * the CURRENT dependency artificer's repairPayload — never a cached value.
     *
     * PRI-718: the dep-derived value alone is NOT the durable truth — the dep
     * chain can be stale (e.g. an older repair's recovered transition re-pointed
     * the evaluator at a superseded artifact). The iteration budget must reflect
     * every durable repair round for THIS evaluator, so the result is the max of
     * the dep-derived value and the highest existing deterministic repair id
     * (probe is bounded: the budget gate stops at 2; the cap only guards against
     * pathological id growth).
     */
    private resolvePriorRepairIteration;
    /**
     * 把 runner verdict 持久化进任务 diagnosticJson(commit 门控的输入)。
     * 失败不静默 (rc-9): emitEvent 后吞掉 — verdict 已在 events/runs 中可观测,
     * 且 commit 门对缺失 verdict 走 legacy 推进,不会因记录失败而卡链。
     */
    /**
     * P0 (INV-2): needs_human_review 是 completion effect 的 materialize 操作 —
     * fail-closed + read-back。写失败 throw → retry_wait → 入口门 resume 同一
     * effect,不问 LLM;禁止吞错后让 caller 标 intent applied
     * (intent applied ⇔ 其 durable effect 已 materialize)。
     */
    private markNeedsHumanReviewOrThrow;
    /**
     * verdict + completion intent 原子落库 (单次 metadata 写)。intent 的存在
     * 证明 output 已 durable (updateRunOutput 在 succeedTask 最前)。
     * 同 epoch crash/retry 重跑经 maybeResumePendingIntent resume,不重问 LLM。
     */
    private recordCompletionOrThrow;
    /** intent APPLIED 后才允许 terminal (P0 invariant 5)。写失败 fail loud。 */
    private markCompletionIntentAppliedOrThrow;
    /**
     * 入口恢复门 (BasePeerRunner hook): pending completion intent (同 epoch)
     * 是 recovery authority。返回非 null = 本次 run 以 resume 完成 (LLM 未被
     * 调用);返回 null = 走正常 LLM 管线。真正的 revision reopen 已清空
     * intent (新 epoch 允许新 verdict);epoch 不匹配的残留视为 stale。
     */
    protected maybeResumePendingIntent(taskId: string, leasedTask: TaskRecord): Promise<PeerRunnerResult<EvaluatorOutputV1> | null>;
    /**
     * P0 (INV-1/INV-5): applied intent 的补 terminal — effects 已 materialize
     * (applied ⇒ INV-2 保证),仅 markTaskSucceeded 缺失。不调用 LLM。
     */
    private finalizeAppliedIntentTerminal;
    /**
     * PRI-629: 应用 Owner verdict override 并收敛 terminal。
     *
     * 顺序 (SPEC §10/§30): 恢复 durable output → 幂等效果 (override decision)
     * → completion intent 标 applied → resolution 标 applied → markTaskSucceeded。
     * 任何 crash 窗口重放同一 resolution,不重新调用 LLM。机器 verdict
     * (runnerDecision) 永不改写。
     */
    private applyOwnerVerdictOverrideAndFinalize;
    /**
     * 从 runs 表恢复 intent 落库前已持久化的 validated output,并交叉核对
     * decision 与 intent 一致 (authority 记录一致性)。intent 的存在保证
     * updateRunOutput 曾成功;缺失/损坏/漂移 = 存储腐坏 → fail loud。
     */
    private recoverIntentOutput;
    /**
     * PRI-509: Seed an artificer repair task or mark the evaluator task
     * needs_human_review when max iterations (2) are reached.
     *
     * Returns:
     *   - { kind: 'repair_seeded', taskId } — a new artificer repair task was created.
     *   - { kind: 'max_iterations_reached' } — task marked needs_human_review (fail loud).
     *
     * Trust boundary (rc-1, rc-2): evaluator output is already validated by
     * validateOutput before succeedTask is called. requiredChanges / concerns
     * are typed as readonly string[] on EvaluatorEvaluation, so element-level
     * re-validation is not required here (rc-4 N/A — not unknown at this point).
     */
    /**
     * Round-2 R2 (Owner 指令 2026-09-08): 从 durable 证据派生本 verdict 的治理
     * 效果。fresh 与 resume 调用同一派生 —— 输入全部是 durable 事实:
     *   - output: intent 落库前已由 executeDeterministicReplay 持久化的
     *     adversarialResult（resume 时 recoverIntentOutput 从 run.outputPayload
     *     恢复同一对象）;
     *   - sourceArtificerArtifactId → durable 工件的 requiresContextVersion;
     *   - priorRepairIteration → durable dependency repairPayload。
     * record 只持久化本函数的结论，不做判断 (指令要求: 禁止把复杂判断逻辑
     * 塞进 recordCompletionOrThrow)。返回 undefined = governance_transition
     * (正常效果由 applyEvaluatorDecisionEffects 执行,无需特判)。
     *
     * fresh 路径的 diagnosticReplayEvidence 仅用于验证"重放确实执行过"这一
     * 控制流事实 (P1 provenance); resume 路径不传时, 以 durable adversarialResult
     * 的形态 (passed === false 且 failedCases 非空) 为等价判据 —— intent 存在
     * 本身即证明 fresh 侧重放已执行并持久化。
     */
    /**
     * Round-2 R2: 读取当前 durable completion intent (pending 或 applied 均可读 —
     * applied 意味着效果已 materialize, 读侧只用于一致性核对, 不会改变路由)。
     * 解析失败/缺 intent 返回 null — 出界判定回退到 fresh 快路径判定
     * (fail-closed, 绝不因读不到 intent 而静默 seed)。
     */
    private readPendingOrAppliedCompletionIntent;
    private deriveGovernanceEffect;
    private maybeSeedArtificerRepair;
    /**
     * Re-inject taskId if stripped by stripLineageFields (PRI-272 / ERR-008).
     * Only fill when absent via Object.hasOwn — present-but-falsy values
     * must reach validation and fail loud (Runtime Contract Rule 3).
     *
     * generatedAt override is handled by the base class — subclasses must call
     * super.postFetchTransform() to inherit it.
     */
    protected postFetchTransform(taskId: string, untrustedOutput: unknown, _context: EvaluatorContext): void;
    protected emitSuccessTelemetry(taskId: string, output: EvaluatorOutputV1): void;
    /**
     * Check lineage strip contract after validation passes.
     * Validates sourceTrace.scribeArtifactId consistency (ERR-004, ERR-008).
     */
    protected checkLineageIntegrity(taskId: string, output: EvaluatorOutputV1, _context: EvaluatorContext): void;
    /**
     * Run a single-round adversarial sandbox replay (PRD Decision 11d).
     * PRI-634 A2/R1: the `output` is accepted in V1 shape too — a code-bearing
     * Artificer artifact requires the gate regardless of whether the evaluator
     * LLM emitted optional V2 fields. Only V2-shaped outputs can contribute
     * LLM-supplied adversarialCases (checked via isEvaluatorOutputV2 below).
     * Pure orchestration of pure functions:
     *   1. Skip if passive review failed (decision !== 'approved' is the LLM's
     *      short-circuit signal — no code to defend). Now observable (R9).
     *   2. Convert adversarialCases → GoldenTrace (all negative, PRI-423).
     *   3. Merge ≥1 positive case from the Artificer golden trace. If the
     *      artificer artifact has no goldenTraceCases (V1 mismatch), degrade:
     *      skip replay with telemetry — do NOT crash.
     *   4. Invoke evaluateRefinerRuleHostGate via injected gateDeps.
     *   5. Populate adversarialResult from the gate result.
     *
     * Never throws — all failure modes degrade to a returned result with a
     * structured reason (ERR-018). The caller persists the updated output.
     */
    private runAdversarialReplay;
    /**
     * PRI-634 R4: verdict-agnostic deterministic replay core. Runs the sandbox
     * gate against the Artificer implementation code and returns the updated
     * output carrying `adversarialResult`. Unlike runAdversarialReplay this does
     * NOT short-circuit on decision !== 'approved' — the caller decides when a
     * replay is useful (approved → binding; needs_revision → diagnostic
     * evidence). Never throws — all failure modes degrade to a returned result
     * with a structured reason (ERR-018). The caller persists the updated output.
     */
    private executeDeterministicReplay;
    /**
     * Parse the Artificer artifact contentJson defensively (Runtime Contract
     * Rule 1/2/5). Returns null on any structural issue — the caller degrades.
     */
    private parseArtificerArtifact;
    /**
     * Extract a principle ID from a PIArtifactRecord. Mirrors the logic in
     * activation/low-risk-writers.ts extractPrincipleId() but operates on
     * PIArtifactRecord (internalization module type) instead of PIArtifactSnapshot
     * (activation module type). Kept inline to avoid a cross-module runtime
     * dependency on the activation module.
     *
     * Resolution order:
     *   1. record.sourcePrincipleId (top-level field)
     *   2. parsed.principleId (contentJson)
     *   3. parsed.sourcePrincipleId (contentJson)
     *   4. parsed.principleDraft.title (contentJson — scribe output shape)
     */
    private static extractPrincipleIdFromArtifact;
    /**
     * Extract structurally-valid positive GoldenTraceCases from the Artificer
     * goldenTraceCases array. Uses buildGoldenTraceFromArtificer (which re-
     * validates each case) and filters for kind='positive'. Returns [] when
     * the input is missing/malformed — the caller degrades to a skip (ERR-069:
     * never trust unvalidated candidates).
     */
    private extractPositiveCases;
    /**
     * PRI-741: host-name parity case. The author's golden trace uses their own
     * tool-name vocabulary (often generic LLM baseline names); the rule must
     * reach the SAME decision when the real host dispatches one of ITS names
     * with the same canonicalKind. The base case is the first NEGATIVE (block)
     * case — a rule matching by author tool-NAME equality silently never fires
     * under the host's real name, which shows up exactly as a missed block;
     * an allow-expectation variant would pass trivially. The host name comes
     * from the host semantic projection (options.hostSemanticContext — the same
     * registry provenance as gateDeps); the author kind comes from the core
     * baseline canonicalizer, so no second semantic truth is introduced.
     *
     * Returns null when no variant applies. All skips EXCEPT one are observable
     * (skip event with structured reason + nextAction, rc-9): a host projection
     * that is absent/empty, golden cases that are missing or structurally
     * invalid, a base case without a usable tool name, and no host tool sharing
     * the author's kind all emit `host_alias_case_skipped`. When the author's
     * name is ALREADY host-real the variant is redundant (the replay already
     * exercises the host surface), so that path returns null silently.
     */
    private generateHostAliasCase;
    /**
     * PRI-485 Phase 6: derive the v2 adversarial case spec from the Artificer
     * artifact and generate the 5 canonical v2 cases.
     *
     * Spec derivation:
     *   - toolName: the first entry in `affectedTools` (validated as a non-empty
     *     string array). Falls back to the first positive case's toolName when
     *     affectedTools is missing/malformed — the rule still governs that tool.
     *   - targetPath: the first positive case's `params.path` (validated as a
     *     non-empty string). When absent, degrade with telemetry (rc-9) and
     *     return [] — v2 cases cannot be path-realistic without a target path.
     *   - canonicalKind: canonicalizeToolKind(toolName) — pure lookup.
     *
     * Never throws. All malformed inputs degrade to [] with a telemetry event
     * carrying a structured `reason` + `nextAction` (Runtime Contract Rule 9).
     */
    private generateV2CasesFromArtificer;
    /**
     * Map sandbox failed cases to EvaluatorAdversarialResult.failedCases.
     *
     * The sandbox reports failedCases by caseId; we enrich each with the
     * adversarial case's attackType and expectedDecision. Cases not found in
     * the adversarial set (e.g. the merged positive case failed — which would
     * indicate a code bug, not an adversarial failure) are reported with
     * attackType='boundary' as a safe default and a note in the rationale
     * (Runtime Contract Rule 9: graceful degradation includes a reason).
     */
    private mapFailedCases;
    /**
     * Assemble and persist the rule artifact when adversarial replay passed
     * (PRD Decision 5). The rule artifact carries implementationCode + the
     * Artificer full golden trace + ruleHostGateDecision, with artifactKind='rule'.
     * After a successful write, marks the artifact 'validated' so RuleHostWriter
     * can activate it.
     *
     * Returns the rule artifactId on success, null on any degradation (missing
     * code/trace, write failure, validation-update failure). Every null path
     * emits structured telemetry with a reason (Runtime Rule 9, ERR-018).
     */
    private assembleRuleArtifact;
    /**
     * Resolve the principle-bearing artifact that the evaluator should validate.
     *
     * Strategy 1: Use scribeArtifactId from sourceTrace (the Scribe artifact
     * carries principleDraft).
     * Strategy 2: Search lineage for principle-kind artifacts with principleDraft.
     * Strategy 3: No principle-bearing artifact found → telemetry, return null.
     *
     * Ambiguous candidates (more than 1) → fail loud with telemetry, return null.
     * Never silently pick the first candidate (ERR-018, ERR-019).
     */
    private resolvePrincipleBearerArtifact;
    /**
     * Check if an artifact's contentJson contains principle-bearing content.
     * Uses Object.hasOwn (ERR-013) and runtime type checks (ERR-001, ERR-005).
     */
    private hasPrincipleDraftContent;
    private static isRecord;
    /**
     * Resolve principle-bearing artifacts from transitive lineage (depth 2).
     *
     * For each direct-lineage artifact, resolve its source task's dependencies
     * and search those artifacts for principle-kind artifacts with principleDraft
     * content. This handles the common case where the evaluator's direct
     * dependency is the artificer, and the scribe (principle-bearer) is a
     * transitive dependency (evaluator → artificer → scribe).
     *
     * Bounded to depth 2 to prevent unbounded traversal. Cycle-safe via the
     * visited set.
     */
    private resolveTransitivePrincipleCandidates;
}
export {};
//# sourceMappingURL=evaluator-runner.d.ts.map