# Output Template

The owner checks two things before sending: the price and the scope. Structure the review around that, then get out of the way.

---

## Structure

```
## Proposal — <customer>, <job in four words>

**<total>** · <one line on how it was priced>

Based on: <the comparables used, with dates and amounts>

### Open assumptions

- <assumption> — <what happens if it's wrong, in dollars>

### Worth knowing before you send

- <risk, in plain terms>

<DOCX and PDF attached.>

<Send question.>
```

Everything above the attachment is for the owner alone. The customer never sees the risk section.

---

## Worked example

```
## Proposal — Ridgeline Property Group, 5 rooftop units

**USD 18,650** · Priced from your Fairmount job, adjusted for the extra unit
and the lower-roof access.

Based on: Fairmount Commercial, Mar 2026 — 4 units, same scope, USD 14,200
          (USD 3,550/unit). Corwin & Bay, Nov 2025 — 6 units, USD 21,300
          (USD 3,550/unit). Your per-unit number has been steady.

### Open assumptions

- Roof access by existing ladder. If a crane is needed, add USD 1,800.
  This one is stated in the proposal, so it's a change order rather than
  an argument.
- Existing electrical is adequate. Quoted separately if inspection says no.

### Worth knowing before you send

- The lower-roof unit is the risk on this job. Photo 3 shows ladder access
  only and I couldn't see the parapet height. If it needs a lift, the USD 900
  allowance won't cover it.
- Dana mentioned "we paid around 8 last time" on the call. That was for two
  units, so USD 18,650 for five is consistent — but it's worth saying that out
  loud in your cover note, because the headline number is more than double
  what she remembers.
- Your usual deposit is 50%. I put 40% here because it's a repeat-adjacent
  customer. Change it if you'd rather not.

Proposal-Ridgeline-2026-07-27.docx and .pdf attached.

Send to Dana for signature via DocuSign, or do you want to change anything first?
```

The second risk bullet is the kind of thing that wins jobs. It came from the transcript, not from the pricing, and no template would have surfaced it.

---

## When a price line is open

Show the proposal as complete except for the gap, and make the ask trivial:

```
## Proposal — Corwin & Bay, controls upgrade

**USD 12,400 + controls integration** · Everything priced except one line.

Line 4 — Controls integration: $______

No comparable in your history and nothing in the rate card. Give me a number
and this is ready to go. Everything else is built.
```

---

## For an RFP response

Compliance leads, because a perfect price on a non-compliant submission loses:

```
## RFP response — Marion County, HVAC maintenance, RFP 26-114

**USD 84,000/yr** · 3-year term, priced from your commercial service contracts.

### Compliance check

✓ USD 2M umbrella — bound Jul 12
✓ CCB license current
✓ 3 references, all commercial, all over 2 years
⚠ Prevailing wage applies. I priced at the current rate sheet, which is
  about 22% over your standard labor. Confirm that's right.

Due Aug 8, 2 pm, submitted via county portal. Page limit 15; we're at 12.

### Worth knowing before you send

- Liquidated damages are USD 500/day past the response window on emergency
  calls. That's aggressive for a maintenance contract and it's the main
  reason to walk if you're not confident on staffing.
```

---

## Rules

**Lead with the number.** It is what the owner opens the message to see.

**Always show the comparables.** It is the difference between a price the owner can approve in ten seconds and one they rebuild from scratch.

**Keep the risk section honest and separate.** It never appears in the customer document. Softening it to be encouraging removes the only reason it exists.

**One send question at the end.** Not a checklist of options — a single yes-or-change.

**Never send without an explicit yes.** A priced document commits the owner's money, their calendar, and their reputation.
