---
title: 'Comparison'
description: 'What makes Chakra UI different from other UI libraries'
tags: ['principles']
---

When building a product, website, or application, it is a common question to
consider the design system or component library to use to help you ship quality
products fast, and deliver value to your customers in a way that scales with
your team.

Here's a comparison between Chakra UI and other popular UI or CSS frameworks
like Theme UI, Tailwind CSS, and Material UI to help you make the best decision.

> This comparison strives to be as accurate and unbiased as possible. If you use
> any of these libraries and feel this information could be improved, feel free
> to suggest changes (with notes or evidence of claims) using the "Edit this
> page on Github" link at the bottom of this page.

## How is Chakra different from Tailwind CSS?

### Overview 🚩

**Tailwind CSS**: CSS Framework that provides atomic CSS classes to help you
**style** components, leaving you to handle lots of other things like
accessibility, component composition, keyboard navigation, style overrides, etc.

**Chakra UI**: A library of carefully created React components that comes with
all the styling benefits of Tailwind and takes care of all the details.

### Learning Curve 🌀

**Tailwind CSS:** If you come from a bootstrap or bulma CSS background, you
might find it easy to pick up Tailwind. However, from a `styled-components` or
`emotion` background, the learning curve can be rather steep.

**Chakra UI**: Comes with a very intuitive, CSS-like, and prop based model of
styling components, making it easy to learn. The components name and prop names
are also very easy to understand.

### Responsive Styles 📱

**Tailwind CSS**: Authoring responsive styles in tailwind requires a combination
of pseudo-classes. This can get rather lengthy as your project grows. The API:
`<img class="w-16 md:w-32 lg:w-48" src="...">`

**Chakra UI**: Authoring responsive styles in a very easy and intuitive way. You
can use either the array or object notation.

The API:

- Array syntax: `<Img w={[16, 32, 48]} src="...">`
- Object syntax: `<Img w={{ base: 16, md: 32, lg: 48 }} src="..." />`

### Style Overrides 💫

In most applications, it is a common challenge to want to override styles for a
specific context to match design requirements.

**Tailwind CSS**: Given that Tailwind is a CSS utility framework, you may need
to figure out the best way to override specific classNames, or write custom CSS.

**Chakra UI**: Given that Chakra UI styles are prop-based, overrides is as easy
as passing a prop.

### Accessibility ♿️

As mentioned earlier, Tailwind CSS is simply a CSS framework similar to
Bootstrap or Bulma CSS. This leaves the user to handle semantic html structure,
meeting the WAI-ARIA requirements, keyboard navigation, etc.

Chakra provides the convenience of Tailwind and all these other benefits out the
box.

### Dark Mode 🌜

**Tailwind CSS**: All components are dark mode compatible with `dark` variant.

**Chakra UI**: All components are light and dark mode compatible. You can also
author your own light and dark mode experience across your application.

## How is Chakra different from Theme UI?

- Chakra UI was heavily inspired by Theme UI and follows the system UI
  specifications.
- Chakra UI provides more components, improved styling API, accessibility, and
  intuitive component APIs than Theme UI.
- Think of Chakra as a more robust version of Theme UI that leverages the full
  power of `styled-system` to provide better component styles and theming.

## How is Chakra different from Material UI?

The Material UI React library provides users with a handful of UI layout tools
but is most famous for its large breadth of pre-styled UI components to which
developers can apply custom styles to override out-of-the-box base styles.
Chakra UI is a more robust, layout-focused library that also provides developers
with UI components similar to those that Material UI provides, but has a greater
focus on the creation of flexible, composable, and scalable code.

A core concept to be considered when comparing the two frameworks is 'Ease of
Modification'. Comparatively, Material UI adds far more classes to individual
HTML tags related to exported components and layouts, forcing developers to
fight against base styles when customizing their interface. Chakra gives
developers far more freedom to manipulate CSS classes of exported components and
layouts and often requires less code to do so. For example, Material UI requires
separate code to control responsive styling based on viewport changes, while
Chakra provides built-in support for responsive styling without the need to
create CSS classes or media queries. If custom styling is not a major concern
for your project, Material UI is beneficial as you can avoid the creation of
custom components that the library provides. If scalable, custom designs are
important for your project (which oftentimes they are), Chakra's developer
convenience shines brighter than Material UI's especially as a project scales
over time.

## How is Chakra different from Ant Design?

The Ant Design React library is an implementation of the
[ant.design](https://ant.design/) design language. This means the components
follow existing design rules and values, only allowing customizability to
certain variables to a limited extent. Chakra is not tied down by any design
systems and offers more freedom with customizing the components to implement
your own design.

### Styling Components

Ant Design components are built to be used out-of-the-box so they have limited
style-specific props and customizations (more on this in the next section). On
the other hand, Chakra components features styles as props as the main way of
styling. So while working with one or the other, you as a designer or developer
will find yourself taking different decisions as you go along.

Take the Button component as an example. A Chakra Button's `colorScheme` prop
has many different values by default and can be customized and/or extended for
you to apply your own designs. In contrast, you need to keep in mind that the
Ant Design Button can only be colored in if it has the `primary` and `danger`
props and nothing else because the existing design values of Ant Design. The
same pattern can be seen in other components such as Layouts, Forms, and
Typography.

### Theming and Customizing

Ant Design has a long list of default variables that can be modified ranging
from colors, paddings, margins, animations, shadows, borders, screen sizes,
dimensions some being generic and some specific to UI components. Customization
beyond modifying these existing variables is not recommended in order to respect
the underlying design specification.

Chakra features easy customizability/extensibility of all global and component
style defaults. New sizes or variants can be defined for each components. On top
of that, you can compose new components out of existing ones or even non-Chakra
components with Chakra Factory.

## The Runtime Trade-off ⚠️

Since Chakra UI uses CSS-in-JS under the hood (`emotion` + `styled-system`),
this flexibility comes with a small price to pay when it comes to runtime. This
runtime footprint is caused by style computations by `styled-system`, and
className generation by `emotion`.

If your app deals with high, frequently changing data that is performance
sensitive, you might notice this footprint as your app grows.

We recommend you compare with alternatives before making the decision to use
Chakra. However, for most small or medium data-driven applications, we think
Chakra UI is a perfect fit.

## The Community 💖

My favourite thing about Chakra UI is the community around it. Despite the fact
that it is still small for now, it is growing daily and everyone is so helpful
and we keep striving for better ways to improve Chakra UI's speed, performance
and developer experience.

## Community Remarks 💬

"When I'm pitching Chakra, my main selling point is that Chakra makes it easier
to customize components to be entirely your own. MUI has a distinctly "material"
look that is difficult to get rid of even if you want to. Chakra strikes a
balance of look nice out of the box and can morph into anything".

**— Vynlar**
[(View Quote)](https://github.com/chakra-ui/chakra-ui/issues/1421#issuecomment-664423035)

"When we were in the process of choosing a component library, like most others
that found Chakra, we were looking for something that did a lot of the heavy
lifting for us whilst being as unopinionated as possible. This was a big reason
that ruled most of the big players out (MUI, Ant). These big players are
awesome, don't get me wrong, but because they come with their own design
languages, you're kinda stuck with their look.

Then there were a bunch of other medium/small players, such as variations of
Bootstrap in React. Among other small issues, these libraries generally don't
have large hyper-active communities.

Then, I found Chakra.

- ✅ A wide range of well-thought components.
- ✅ Unopinionated. Chakra gives you the tools to easily make your components
  look the way you want.
- ✅ Built with accessibility in mind! You mean I don't have to worry about that
  anymore!?
- ✅ Amazing community, led by a great team. ❤️

I feel like Chakra is becoming a movement, and I'm excited for it."

**— ChasinHues**
[(View Quote)](https://github.com/chakra-ui/chakra-ui/issues/1421#issuecomment-692369895)