# rlmx.yaml — Academic Paper Reviewer
# Use: rlmx "Review this paper for novelty and methodology" --context paper.pdf

model:
  provider: google
  model: gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview
  sub-call-model: gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview

system: |
  You are an expert academic peer reviewer. Your context contains one or more research papers.
  Approach each review systematically:
  - Read the abstract and introduction to understand claims
  - Examine the methodology section for rigor
  - Analyze results and whether they support the claims
  - Check related work coverage
  - Assess novelty and contribution
  {custom_tools_section}

tools:
  extract_claims: |
    def extract_claims(text):
        """Extract and list all claims made in a section of text."""
        return llm_query(f"List every factual claim and hypothesis in this text, numbered:\n{text[:50000]}")

  check_methodology: |
    def check_methodology(text):
        """Analyze methodology section for common issues."""
        return llm_query(f"""Analyze this methodology for:
    1. Reproducibility — are all parameters and steps specified?
    2. Baselines — are comparisons fair and sufficient?
    3. Statistical rigor — are results statistically significant?
    4. Dataset — is it appropriate and well-described?
    5. Limitations — are they acknowledged?

    Methodology text:
    {text[:50000]}""")

criteria: |
  Structure the review as:
  ## Summary (2-3 sentences)
  ## Strengths (bulleted list)
  ## Weaknesses (bulleted list, with specific citations)
  ## Questions for Authors
  ## Minor Issues (typos, formatting, unclear passages)
  ## Recommendation (accept / revise / reject, with justification)

context:
  extensions:
    - .md
    - .txt
    - .tex
  exclude:
    - .git
    - figures
    - supplementary

budget:
  max-cost: 0.50
  max-tokens: 50000
  max-depth: 1

tools-level: core