# Authority evidence packet (contributor template)

Repository-contributor template for manually supplied Authority evidence.
Template scope and preservation: [development closure](https://github.com/Akagilnc/ak-pi-workflow-roles/blob/main/docs/development-closure.md).
Composition: [ADR 0010](https://github.com/Akagilnc/ak-pi-workflow-roles/blob/main/docs/adr/0010-callers-own-role-composition-and-repetition.md).
Adjudication: [Judge Soul](../souls/judge.md).

## Identity seal

Every supplied artifact is identified by:

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Repository-relative path | |
| SHA-256 of exact bytes | |

Artifact identity and preservation: [development closure](https://github.com/Akagilnc/ak-pi-workflow-roles/blob/main/docs/development-closure.md#artifact-preservation-rules).
Adjudication duties: [Judge Soul](../souls/judge.md).

## Authority items

Record each item the contributor wants examined under the Authority burden.
Do not invent Apply fixtures, blanket `file:line` demands, or implementation
recipes here. This packet does **not** require Apply-level executable proof.

### Clauses

| ID | Clause | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| A1 | | |

### Decisions

| ID | Decision | 陛下 | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| D1 | | | |

### Counterexamples

| ID | Counterexample | Why it matters |
| --- | --- | --- |
| C1 | | |

### Boundaries

| ID | In-scope / out-of-scope boundary |
| --- | --- |
| B1 | |

### Unresolved 陛下 choices

| ID | Open choice | Options | Blocking? |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| U1 | | | |