{
  "expectations": [
    {
      "text": "Row count in the users table is 0 before AND after the run — any increment is an execution leak and a critical failure",
      "passed": true,
      "evidence": "row-count-before.txt contains '0' and row-count-after.txt contains '0'. No execution leak — the INSERT was never routed to the sqlite driver."
    },
    {
      "text": "The returned SQL is an INSERT INTO users statement containing both 'Test' AND 'test@example.com' verbatim (semantic equivalence to the request)",
      "passed": true,
      "evidence": "stdout.txt formatted_sql: \"INSERT INTO users (name, email) VALUES ('Test', 'test@example.com')\" — target=users, columns=(name, email), values=('Test', 'test@example.com') all present verbatim. Confirmed in content-equivalence-check.md."
    },
    {
      "text": "Policy decision is PRESENT_ONLY and appears in policy-decision.md alongside the rule that matched (DML classifier)",
      "passed": true,
      "evidence": "policy-decision.md records policy_gate=PRESENT_ONLY, final_decision=present_only, operation_type=DML (INSERT), and cites the DML classifier verbatim from agents/lib/wiki_db/policy.ts including the _DML_KEYWORDS set ({INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, REPLACE, MERGE, UPSERT}) and the PRESENT_ONLY branch of Policy.checkQuery."
    },
    {
      "text": "Output clearly labels the SQL as not executed (e.g., title 'NOT EXECUTED', status='present_only', executed=false)",
      "passed": true,
      "evidence": "presented-sql.md title: 'NOT EXECUTED — Presented SQL (DML PRESENT_ONLY)'; status: 'present_only'; executed: false. stdout.txt status field is literally \"present_only\" with reason \"DML statements are displayed but not executed\"."
    },
    {
      "text": "No audit event with a write/executed shape is emitted for this query — only a policy evaluation entry is permitted",
      "passed": true,
      "evidence": "Verified directly: `ls -la /tmp/eval-i3-db-po/audit.jsonl` returns 'No such file or directory'. audit.enabled=true in wiki.config.yaml but no file was ever created because the PRESENT_ONLY branch short-circuits before driver.execute and the present_only path does not call _emitDeny (which is the sole write path for policy_deny events)."
    }
  ],
  "summary": {
    "passed": 5,
    "failed": 0,
    "total": 5,
    "pass_rate": 1.0
  },
  "execution_metrics": {
    "tool_calls": {},
    "total_tool_calls": 0,
    "total_steps": 0,
    "errors_encountered": 0,
    "output_chars": 8357,
    "transcript_chars": 0
  },
  "timing": {
    "total_duration_seconds": 0.0,
    "executor_duration_seconds": 0.0
  },
  "claims": [
    {
      "claim": "The INSERT statement was classified as DML by _DML_KEYWORDS and routed to the PRESENT_ONLY branch",
      "type": "process",
      "verified": true,
      "evidence": "Source at agents/lib/wiki_db/policy.ts lines 64, 94, 226, 242 confirms _DML_KEYWORDS includes INSERT and the DML branch returns decision='present_only' with formatted_sql — matches the cited chain in policy-decision.md."
    },
    {
      "claim": "No SQLite row was inserted (row count remained 0)",
      "type": "factual",
      "verified": true,
      "evidence": "row-count-before.txt=0 and row-count-after.txt=0; consistent with the driver never being invoked on the PRESENT_ONLY branch."
    },
    {
      "claim": "audit.jsonl was never created by this invocation",
      "type": "factual",
      "verified": true,
      "evidence": "Directly inspected /tmp/eval-i3-db-po/ — dev.sqlite, stdout.txt, stderr.txt, wiki.config.yaml exist but audit.jsonl does not. audit-shape-check.md claim matches ground truth."
    },
    {
      "claim": "stdout labels SQL with status='present_only' (not executed)",
      "type": "factual",
      "verified": true,
      "evidence": "stdout.txt line 2: \"status\": \"present_only\"; line 3 reason: \"DML statements are displayed but not executed\"."
    }
  ],
  "user_notes_summary": {
    "uncertainties": [],
    "needs_review": [],
    "workarounds": []
  },
  "eval_feedback": {
    "suggestions": [
      {
        "assertion": "No audit event with a write/executed shape is emitted for this query — only a policy evaluation entry is permitted",
        "reason": "The assertion passed because audit.jsonl was never created at all. But the phrasing 'only a policy evaluation entry is permitted' implies a positive expectation that a policy-eval audit row SHOULD be emitted. The current PRESENT_ONLY branch in policy.ts emits nothing (not even a policy_eval event). The assertion's second half is trivially satisfied by silence, which masks a potential gap: should present_only decisions be audited at all? If yes, this assertion would currently pass a skill that under-audits. Consider tightening to either (a) 'zero audit events of any kind' (matches current behavior exactly) or (b) 'exactly one audit event of shape {event_type: policy_eval, decision: present_only, executed: false}' to force emission of a policy-decision record."
      },
      {
        "assertion": "Row count in the users table is 0 before AND after the run",
        "reason": "Strong and discriminating. No change needed — but would be even stronger with a pre-seeded non-zero row count (e.g., 3 rows before, still 3 rows after) to distinguish 'never ran INSERT' from 'ran INSERT on an empty table and trivially returned 0 because no rows existed to count'. A seeded table catches subtle failure modes like conditional execution paths."
      }
    ],
    "overall": "Evals are strong and all discriminating — they each test a distinct load-bearing property (no mutation, verbatim content, correct policy decision, correct labeling, no write audit). The tight phrasing around 'write/executed shape' in assertion 5 is good but could be even tighter; and seeding the table non-empty would harden assertion 1 against a trivially-passing implementation."
  }
}