Definitions/Def_ExtEndgame_ChainAdm.lean
Admissible-carrier Selmer realisation of cyclotomic extension classes
Throughout, p is a prime, V runs over \mathbb{Z}/p-modules (in the lowest universe) carrying an action of \mathrm{Aut}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q}) commuting with the scalars, and C \subseteq V is a \mathbb{Z}/p-submodule satisfying IsAdmissibleExtension p V C: C is Galois-stable and pointwise fixed, \sigma\cdot x - \overline{\mathrm{cycloExp}\,\sigma}\cdot x \in C for all \sigma and all x \in V (so V/C is the mod-p cyclotomic character), |C| = p, |V| = p^2, inertia at every prime \ell \neq p acts trivially on V, and at every valuation subring over p the decomposition group preserves some complement of C. The cochain attached to v_0 \in V is \mathrm{extClassFun}(\chi, v_0)(\sigma) = \chi(\sigma)^{-1}\bigl(\sigma\cdot v_0 - \chi(\sigma)v_0\bigr) with \chi = cycloChar p the mod-p cyclotomic character.
ExtClassesAreCoboundaries p asserts that for every such admissible pair and every v_0 \notin C there is b \in C with \mathrm{extClassFun}(\chi, v_0)(\sigma) = \chi(\sigma)^{-1}b - b for all \sigma, i.e. the class is a coboundary valued in C. ExtSelmerRealization and ExtSelmerRealizationAdm place this conclusion behind a Selmer class: for an abstract group \Gamma', finitely many local groups \Gamma'_v with maps \mathrm{loc}'_v, a character \psi : \Gamma' \to (\mathbb{Z}/p)^\times with associated one-dimensional representation ofChar ψ, a set P of places and local subspaces U_v \subseteq H^1(\Gamma'_v, \psi), they assert that for every admissible pair and v_0 \notin C there is an element x of the Selmer group for the conditions \mathrm{extConditions} (0 at places of P, U_v elsewhere) — intersected with a submodule \mathrm{adm} in the second version — such that x = 0 implies the coboundary conclusion. Thus each predicate is implied by non-vanishing of the relevant Selmer group, and conversely yields the coboundary statement once that group vanishes. extSelmerRealizationAdm_top_iff identifies the two when \mathrm{adm} = \top.
ExtChainAdmResidual bundles as fields the hypotheses of the vanishing argument for a datum (\mathrm{loc}', \psi, M', \mathrm{pairing}, P, U, \mathrm{adm}, \mathrm{adm}', \rho, f): the admissible realisation predicate; a Greenberg–Wiles inequality datum IsGreenbergWilesLeDatumAdm for the conditions \mathrm{extConditions} and the carriers \mathrm{adm}, \mathrm{adm}'; the local bound \sum_v \dim \mathrm{extConditions}_v \le \sum_v \dim H^0(\Gamma'_v, \psi); vanishing of H^0 for both \psi and M'; that f maps every element of the dual admissible Selmer group (for the \mathrm{pairing}-orthogonal conditions) to an \omega^{p-2}-eigenvector for \rho, meaning \rho(d)a = d^{\,p-2}a; injectivity of f on that group; and that the Stickelberger endomorphism \sum_{0 < c,\ 2c < p} \rho(\bar c)^{-1} annihilates A.
Relation to Mathlib
Mathlib supplies the cyclotomic character (modularCyclotomicCharacter) and group cohomology of representations; the Selmer groups with local conditions, their admissible-carrier variants, the Greenberg–Wiles inequality data, the admissible-extension predicate and the Stickelberger vocabulary are the project's own.
Where it is used
These predicates form the interface of the argument that an admissible extension of the mod-p cyclotomic character by the trivial character, unramified outside p and locally split at p, has vanishing class: the class is realised in a Selmer group, whose vanishing is forced by a Greenberg–Wiles inequality together with Stickelberger annihilation on an \omega^{p-2}-eigenspace. The concrete arithmetic instantiation, with the p-torsion of the class group of \mathbb{Q}(\zeta_p) as the module A, is made elsewhere.
References
- L. C. Washington, Introduction to Cyclotomic Fields, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 83, Springer, 2nd ed., 1997
- K. A. Ribet, A modular construction of unramified p-extensions of Q(μ_p), Inventiones Mathematicae 34 (1976), 151–162
References are suggested automatically and have not been individually verified.
English text generated automatically from the Lean source; the Lean statement is authoritative.
- 101 lines
- 21 declarations
- used in the statements of 0 theorems and imported by 0 proofs
- imports 5 definition modules
Source file: Definitions/Def_ExtEndgame_ChainAdm.lean
Imports
Imported by
Declarations
- def
ExtCitation.ExtClassesAreCoboundaries - def
ExtCitation.ExtSelmerRealization - def
ExtCitation.ExtSelmerRealizationAdm - theorem
ExtCitation.extSelmerRealizationAdm_top_iff - structure
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.loc' - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.pairing - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.H1 - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.P - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.U - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.adm - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.adm' - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.f - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.hrealAdm - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.hGWAdm - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.hsum - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.hM - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.hM' - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.heig - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.hinj - field
ExtCitation.ExtChainAdmResidual.hann
Source
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_GroupCohomology_SelmerAdm import Definitions.Def_DualSelmer_ExtConditions import Definitions.Def_ExtCitation_KummerBridge import Definitions.Def_ExtCitation_AdmissibleExtension import Definitions.Def_Stickelberger_Basic set_option autoImplicit false open CategoryTheory Module groupCohomology namespace ExtCitation def ExtClassesAreCoboundaries (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] : Prop := ∀ (V : Type) [AddCommGroup V] [Module (ZMod p) V] [DistribMulAction (AlgebraicClosure ℚ ≃ₐ[ℚ] AlgebraicClosure ℚ) V] [SMulCommClass (AlgebraicClosure ℚ ≃ₐ[ℚ] AlgebraicClosure ℚ) (ZMod p) V] (C : Submodule (ZMod p) V), IsAdmissibleExtension p V C → ∀ v₀ : V, v₀ ∉ C → ∃ b ∈ C, ∀ σ : AlgebraicClosure ℚ ≃ₐ[ℚ] AlgebraicClosure ℚ, extClassFun (cycloChar p) v₀ σ = ((((cycloChar p σ)⁻¹ : (ZMod p)ˣ) : ZMod p)) • b - b def ExtSelmerRealization (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] {Γ' : Type} [Group Γ'] {ι' : Type} [Fintype ι'] {Γv' : ι' → Type} [∀ v, Group (Γv' v)] (loc' : ∀ v, Γv' v →* Γ') (ψ : Γ' →* (ZMod p)ˣ) (P : Set ι') (U : ∀ v, Submodule (ZMod p) (H1 (Rep.res (loc' v) (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ)))) : Prop := ∀ (V : Type) [AddCommGroup V] [Module (ZMod p) V] [DistribMulAction (AlgebraicClosure ℚ ≃ₐ[ℚ] AlgebraicClosure ℚ) V] [SMulCommClass (AlgebraicClosure ℚ ≃ₐ[ℚ] AlgebraicClosure ℚ) (ZMod p) V] (C : Submodule (ZMod p) V), IsAdmissibleExtension p V C → ∀ v₀ : V, v₀ ∉ C → ∃ x ∈ selmer loc' (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ) (extConditions loc' (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ) P U), (x = 0 → ∃ b ∈ C, ∀ σ : AlgebraicClosure ℚ ≃ₐ[ℚ] AlgebraicClosure ℚ, extClassFun (cycloChar p) v₀ σ = ((((cycloChar p σ)⁻¹ : (ZMod p)ˣ) : ZMod p)) • b - b) def ExtSelmerRealizationAdm (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] {Γ' : Type} [Group Γ'] {ι' : Type} [Fintype ι'] {Γv' : ι' → Type} [∀ v, Group (Γv' v)] (loc' : ∀ v, Γv' v →* Γ') (ψ : Γ' →* (ZMod p)ˣ) (P : Set ι') (U : ∀ v, Submodule (ZMod p) (H1 (Rep.res (loc' v) (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ)))) (adm : Submodule (ZMod p) (H1 (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ))) : Prop := ∀ (V : Type) [AddCommGroup V] [Module (ZMod p) V] [DistribMulAction (AlgebraicClosure ℚ ≃ₐ[ℚ] AlgebraicClosure ℚ) V] [SMulCommClass (AlgebraicClosure ℚ ≃ₐ[ℚ] AlgebraicClosure ℚ) (ZMod p) V] (C : Submodule (ZMod p) V), IsAdmissibleExtension p V C → ∀ v₀ : V, v₀ ∉ C → ∃ x ∈ selmerAdm loc' (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ) (extConditions loc' (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ) P U) adm, (x = 0 → ∃ b ∈ C, ∀ σ : AlgebraicClosure ℚ ≃ₐ[ℚ] AlgebraicClosure ℚ, extClassFun (cycloChar p) v₀ σ = ((((cycloChar p σ)⁻¹ : (ZMod p)ˣ) : ZMod p)) • b - b) theorem extSelmerRealizationAdm_top_iff (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] {Γ' : Type} [Group Γ'] {ι' : Type} [Fintype ι'] {Γv' : ι' → Type} [∀ v, Group (Γv' v)] (loc' : ∀ v, Γv' v →* Γ') (ψ : Γ' →* (ZMod p)ˣ) (P : Set ι') (U : ∀ v, Submodule (ZMod p) (H1 (Rep.res (loc' v) (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ)))) : ExtSelmerRealizationAdm p loc' ψ P U ⊤ ↔ ExtSelmerRealization p loc' ψ P U := by unfold ExtSelmerRealizationAdm ExtSelmerRealization simp_rw [selmerAdm_top] structure ExtChainAdmResidual (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] {Γ' : Type} [Group Γ'] {ι' : Type} [Fintype ι'] {Γv' : ι' → Type} [∀ v, Group (Γv' v)] (loc' : ∀ v, Γv' v →* Γ') (ψ : Γ' →* (ZMod p)ˣ) (M' : Rep (ZMod p) Γ') (pairing : ∀ v, H1 (Rep.res (loc' v) (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ)) →ₗ[ZMod p] H1 (Rep.res (loc' v) M') →ₗ[ZMod p] (ZMod p)) (P : Set ι') (U : ∀ v, Submodule (ZMod p) (H1 (Rep.res (loc' v) (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ)))) (adm : Submodule (ZMod p) (H1 (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ))) (adm' : Submodule (ZMod p) (H1 M')) {A : Type} [AddCommGroup A] [Module (ZMod p) A] (ρ : (ZMod p)ˣ →* Module.End (ZMod p) A) (f : H1 M' →ₗ[ZMod p] A) : Prop where hrealAdm : ExtSelmerRealizationAdm p loc' ψ P U adm hGWAdm : IsGreenbergWilesLeDatumAdm loc' (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ) M' pairing (extConditions loc' (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ) P U) adm adm' hsum : ∑ v, finrank (ZMod p) (extConditions loc' (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ) P U v) ≤ ∑ v, finrank (ZMod p) (Rep.res (loc' v) (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ)).ρ.invariants hM : finrank (ZMod p) (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ).ρ.invariants = 0 hM' : finrank (ZMod p) M'.ρ.invariants = 0 heig : ∀ x ∈ selmerAdm loc' M' (dualConditions loc' (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ) M' pairing (extConditions loc' (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ) P U)) adm', Stickelberger.IsOmegaEigenvector ρ (p - 2) (f x) hinj : ∀ x ∈ selmerAdm loc' M' (dualConditions loc' (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ) M' pairing (extConditions loc' (ofChar (k := ZMod p) ψ) P U)) adm', f x = 0 → x = 0 hann : Stickelberger.StickelbergerAnnihilates ρ end ExtCitation
Statements phrased using this module (0)
No statement module imports it directly (it is used through other definition modules or by proofs).