Definitions/Def_CerednikDrinfeld_MumfordQuotientNormalizer.lean
Conjugation transport and normaliser action on invariant fields
The standing context is a field K, a group G, and a commutative K-algebra M which is a domain, with G acting on M by ring automorphisms that fix the image of K (an action commuting with the K-scalars). The G-action extends to \operatorname{Frac}(M), and for a subgroup \Delta\le G the subfield \mathcal K_\Delta= invariantFieldOf K G M Δ consists of those x\in\operatorname{Frac}(M) with \delta\cdot x=x for all \delta\in\Delta. Two transport lemmas record that if every d\in\Delta' satisfies g^{-1}dg\in\Delta, then g\cdot x\in\mathcal K_{\Delta'} for x\in\mathcal K_\Delta; in particular this holds with \Delta'=\Delta when g normalises \Delta. Given g\in G and subgroups \Delta,\Delta' together with the hypothesis d\in\Delta'\iff g^{-1}dg\in\Delta (the conjugate subgroup is passed as a separate subgroup with its membership law rather than as a fixed term), conjTransportRingEquiv is the ring isomorphism \mathcal K_\Delta\xrightarrow{\sim}\mathcal K_{\Delta'}, x\mapsto g\cdot x, with inverse y\mapsto g^{-1}\cdot y, and conjTransport upgrades it to a K-algebra isomorphism; coercion lemmas identify the underlying elements of the map and its inverse. Two membership lemmas relate the hypothesis to standard spellings: d lies in the image of \Delta under conjugation by g iff g^{-1}dg\in\Delta, and for g in the normaliser of the underlying set of \Delta one has d\in\Delta\iff g^{-1}dg\in\Delta. From this, normalizerAct is the group homomorphism from the normaliser of \Delta to \operatorname{Aut}_K(\mathcal K_\Delta) sending n to x\mapsto n\cdot x. Further lemmas record that elements of \Delta act as the identity (so the action factors through N_G(\Delta)/\Delta, the quotient itself not being formed), that for a normal subgroup this action agrees with residualAct, that it commutes with the semilinear coefficient action AmbientSemilinearAut.coeffActOf, and that transports for \Delta_2\le\Delta_1 agree along the resulting inclusion of invariant fields.
Relation to Mathlib
Built on Mathlib's Subgroup.normalizer, MulAut.conj and fixed-point subfields; the invariant field of a subgroup acting on \operatorname{Frac}(M), its transport under conjugation, and the normaliser action on it are the project's own constructions.
Where it is used
These constructions belong to the Čerednik–Drinfeld / Mumford-curve layer, where function fields of quotients are presented as invariant subfields \operatorname{Frac}(M)^\Delta of a fraction field carrying a group action; the normaliser action supplies the extra automorphisms (such as type-exchanging and Atkin–Lehner-style involutions) of such a quotient, and the compatibility with the semilinear coefficient action governs its behaviour under base change.
References
- D. Mumford, An analytic construction of degenerating curves over complete local rings, Compositio Mathematica 24 (1972), 129–174
- J.-F. Boutot and H. Carayol, Uniformisation p-adique des courbes de Shimura: les théorèmes de Čerednik et de Drinfeld, Astérisque 196–197 (1991), 45–158
References are suggested automatically and have not been individually verified.
English text generated automatically from the Lean source; the Lean statement is authoritative.
- 114 lines
- 16 declarations
- used in the statements of 16 theorems and imported by 24 proofs
- imports 1 definition modules
Source file: Definitions/Def_CerednikDrinfeld_MumfordQuotientNormalizer.lean
Imported by
- no other definition module
Declarations
- theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.smul_mem_invariantFieldOf_of_forall_mem - theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.smul_mem_invariantFieldOf_of_mem_normalizer - def
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.conjTransportRingEquiv - theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.coe_conjTransportRingEquiv - def
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.conjTransport - theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.coe_conjTransport - theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.coe_conjTransport_symm - theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.mem_map_conj_iff - theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.mem_iff_of_mem_normalizer - def
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.normalizerAct - theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.coe_normalizerAct - theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.normalizerAct_eq_one_of_mem - theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.normalizerAct_eq_residualAct - theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.coeffActOf_comm_conjTransport - theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.coeffActOf_comm_normalizerAct - theorem
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.coe_conjTransport_eq_of_le
Source
import Definitions.Def_CerednikDrinfeld_MumfordQuotient set_option autoImplicit false noncomputable section open CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford namespace CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford variable (K : Type) [Field K] (G : Type) [Group G] (M : Type) [CommRing M] [Algebra K M] variable [MulSemiringAction G M] [SMulCommClass G K M] theorem smul_mem_invariantFieldOf_of_forall_mem [IsDomain M] (g : G) {Δ Δ' : Subgroup G} (h : ∀ d : G, d ∈ Δ' → g⁻¹ * d * g ∈ Δ) {x : FractionRing M} (hx : x ∈ invariantFieldOf K G M Δ) : g • x ∈ invariantFieldOf K G M Δ' := fun d hd => by rw [← mul_smul, show d * g = g * (g⁻¹ * d * g) from by group, mul_smul] congr 1 exact hx (g⁻¹ * d * g) (h d hd) theorem smul_mem_invariantFieldOf_of_mem_normalizer [IsDomain M] (Δ : Subgroup G) {g : G} (hg : g ∈ Subgroup.normalizer (Δ : Set G)) {x : FractionRing M} (hx : x ∈ invariantFieldOf K G M Δ) : g • x ∈ invariantFieldOf K G M Δ := smul_mem_invariantFieldOf_of_forall_mem K G M g (fun d hd => (Subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff''.1 hg d).1 hd) hx def conjTransportRingEquiv [IsDomain M] (g : G) (Δ Δ' : Subgroup G) (h : ∀ d : G, d ∈ Δ' ↔ g⁻¹ * d * g ∈ Δ) : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ) ≃+* ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ') where toFun x := ⟨g • (x : FractionRing M), smul_mem_invariantFieldOf_of_forall_mem K G M g (fun d hd => (h d).1 hd) x.2⟩ invFun y := ⟨g⁻¹ • (y : FractionRing M), smul_mem_invariantFieldOf_of_forall_mem K G M g⁻¹ (fun d hd => (h (g⁻¹⁻¹ * d * g⁻¹)).2 (by simpa only [inv_inv, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel_left, inv_mul_cancel_left, inv_mul_cancel, mul_one] using hd)) y.2⟩ left_inv x := Subtype.ext (inv_smul_smul g (x : FractionRing M)) right_inv y := Subtype.ext (smul_inv_smul g (y : FractionRing M)) map_mul' x y := Subtype.ext (smul_mul' g (x : FractionRing M) y) map_add' x y := Subtype.ext (smul_add g (x : FractionRing M) y) theorem coe_conjTransportRingEquiv [IsDomain M] (g : G) (Δ Δ' : Subgroup G) (h : ∀ d : G, d ∈ Δ' ↔ g⁻¹ * d * g ∈ Δ) (x : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ)) : ((conjTransportRingEquiv K G M g Δ Δ' h x : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ')) : FractionRing M) = g • (x : FractionRing M) := rfl def conjTransport [IsDomain M] (g : G) (Δ Δ' : Subgroup G) (h : ∀ d : G, d ∈ Δ' ↔ g⁻¹ * d * g ∈ Δ) : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ) ≃ₐ[K] ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ') := AlgEquiv.ofRingEquiv (f := conjTransportRingEquiv K G M g Δ Δ' h) (fun c => Subtype.ext (by rw [coe_conjTransportRingEquiv, algebraMap_invariantFieldOf_coe, algebraMap_invariantFieldOf_coe] exact smul_algebraMap_const K G M g c)) theorem coe_conjTransport [IsDomain M] (g : G) (Δ Δ' : Subgroup G) (h : ∀ d : G, d ∈ Δ' ↔ g⁻¹ * d * g ∈ Δ) (x : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ)) : ((conjTransport K G M g Δ Δ' h x : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ')) : FractionRing M) = g • (x : FractionRing M) := rfl theorem coe_conjTransport_symm [IsDomain M] (g : G) (Δ Δ' : Subgroup G) (h : ∀ d : G, d ∈ Δ' ↔ g⁻¹ * d * g ∈ Δ) (y : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ')) : (((conjTransport K G M g Δ Δ' h).symm y : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ)) : FractionRing M) = g⁻¹ • (y : FractionRing M) := rfl theorem mem_map_conj_iff (g : G) (Δ : Subgroup G) (d : G) : d ∈ Δ.map (MulAut.conj g).toMonoidHom ↔ g⁻¹ * d * g ∈ Δ := by constructor · rintro ⟨e, he, rfl⟩ simpa [MulAut.conj_apply, mul_assoc] using he · intro hd exact ⟨g⁻¹ * d * g, hd, by simp [MulAut.conj_apply, mul_assoc]⟩ theorem mem_iff_of_mem_normalizer (Δ : Subgroup G) {g : G} (hg : g ∈ Subgroup.normalizer (Δ : Set G)) (d : G) : d ∈ Δ ↔ g⁻¹ * d * g ∈ Δ := Subgroup.mem_normalizer_iff''.1 hg d def normalizerAct [IsDomain M] (Δ : Subgroup G) : ↥(Subgroup.normalizer (Δ : Set G)) →* (↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ) ≃ₐ[K] ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ)) where toFun n := conjTransport K G M (n : G) Δ Δ (mem_iff_of_mem_normalizer G Δ n.2) map_one' := AlgEquiv.ext fun x => Subtype.ext (one_smul G (x : FractionRing M)) map_mul' n n' := AlgEquiv.ext fun x => Subtype.ext (mul_smul (n : G) (n' : G) (x : FractionRing M)) theorem coe_normalizerAct [IsDomain M] (Δ : Subgroup G) (n : ↥(Subgroup.normalizer (Δ : Set G))) (x : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ)) : ((normalizerAct K G M Δ n x : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ)) : FractionRing M) = (n : G) • (x : FractionRing M) := rfl theorem normalizerAct_eq_one_of_mem [IsDomain M] (Δ : Subgroup G) {n : ↥(Subgroup.normalizer (Δ : Set G))} (hn : (n : G) ∈ Δ) : normalizerAct K G M Δ n = 1 := AlgEquiv.ext fun x => Subtype.ext (x.2 (n : G) hn) theorem normalizerAct_eq_residualAct [IsDomain M] (N : Subgroup G) [N.Normal] (n : ↥(Subgroup.normalizer (N : Set G))) : normalizerAct K G M N n = residualAct K G M N (n : G) := AlgEquiv.ext fun _ => Subtype.ext rfl theorem coeffActOf_comm_conjTransport [IsDomain M] (s : AmbientSemilinearAut K G M) (g : G) (Δ Δ' : Subgroup G) (h : ∀ d : G, d ∈ Δ' ↔ g⁻¹ * d * g ∈ Δ) (x : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ)) : AlgebraicCurve.SemilinearAut.toRingAut (AmbientSemilinearAut.coeffActOf Δ' s) (conjTransport K G M g Δ Δ' h x) = conjTransport K G M g Δ Δ' h (AlgebraicCurve.SemilinearAut.toRingAut (AmbientSemilinearAut.coeffActOf Δ s) x) := Subtype.ext (by rw [AmbientSemilinearAut.coe_coeffActOf_toRingAut, coe_conjTransport, coe_conjTransport, AmbientSemilinearAut.coe_coeffActOf_toRingAut, AmbientSemilinearAut.fracMap_smul]) theorem coeffActOf_comm_normalizerAct [IsDomain M] (s : AmbientSemilinearAut K G M) (Δ : Subgroup G) (n : ↥(Subgroup.normalizer (Δ : Set G))) (x : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ)) : AlgebraicCurve.SemilinearAut.toRingAut (AmbientSemilinearAut.coeffActOf Δ s) (normalizerAct K G M Δ n x) = normalizerAct K G M Δ n (AlgebraicCurve.SemilinearAut.toRingAut (AmbientSemilinearAut.coeffActOf Δ s) x) := coeffActOf_comm_conjTransport K G M s (n : G) Δ Δ (mem_iff_of_mem_normalizer G Δ n.2) x theorem coe_conjTransport_eq_of_le [IsDomain M] (g : G) {Δ₁ Δ₂ Δ₁' Δ₂' : Subgroup G} (h12 : Δ₂ ≤ Δ₁) (h₁ : ∀ d : G, d ∈ Δ₁' ↔ g⁻¹ * d * g ∈ Δ₁) (h₂ : ∀ d : G, d ∈ Δ₂' ↔ g⁻¹ * d * g ∈ Δ₂) (x : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ₁)) : ((conjTransport K G M g Δ₂ Δ₂' h₂ ⟨x, invariantFieldOf_mono_of_le K G M h12 x.2⟩ : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ₂')) : FractionRing M) = ((conjTransport K G M g Δ₁ Δ₁' h₁ x : ↥(invariantFieldOf K G M Δ₁')) : FractionRing M) := rfl end CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford end
Statements phrased using this module (16)
- Natural equivariant uniformisation of Jacobians of Mumford quotients
AlgebraicCurve.Pic0.exists_equivariantUniformization_family_natural_of_mumfordQuotient_of_v_card_stabilizer_eq_one296 below · depth 19 - Push-forward square for pinned Mumford uniformisations along φ
AlgebraicCurve.Pic0.eFull_comp_pullback_eq_mk_pushforwardAlong_of_mumfordQuotient_theta65 below · depth 20 - Pullback compatibility of pinned Mumford uniformisations of Pic⁰
AlgebraicCurve.Pic0.eFull_comp_pushforward_eq_mk_pullbackAlong_of_mumfordQuotient_theta_of_v_card_stabilizer_eq_one138 below · depth 20 - Equivariant Manin–Drinfeld uniformisation of Jacobians of Mumford quotients
AlgebraicCurve.Pic0.exists_equivariantUniformization_of_mumfordQuotient_theta_of_mem_valuationSubring_iff_of_v_card_stabilizer_eq_one247 below · depth 20 - Adjointness of pullback and pushforward for Mumford period pairings
AlgebraicCurve.Pic0.periodPairing_pullback_eq_periodPairing_pushforward_of_mumfordQuotient_theta50 below · depth 20 - Twisted D× C₂× C₂ symmetry of an invariant function field
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.exists_symmetryGroup_semilinearAut_invariantFieldOf0 below · depth 20 - Theta torus point lifting a two-point divisor and its push-forward
AlgebraicCurve.Pic0.exists_eFull_eq_mk_single_sub_single_and_eFull_comp_pullback_eq_mk_pushforwardAlong_of_mumfordQuotient_theta62 below · depth 21 - A theta torus point compatible with degeneracy push-forward
AlgebraicCurve.Pic0.exists_eFull_eq_mk_single_sub_single_and_eFull_comp_pushforward_eq_mk_pullbackAlong_of_mumfordQuotient_theta_of_v_card_stabilizer_eq_one135 below · depth 21 - Period datum of a Mumford quotient pinned to analytic periods
AlgebraicCurve.Pic0.exists_periodDatum_Q_mul_period_eq_one_of_mumfordQuotient81 below · depth 21 - Theta uniformisation of Pic⁰ of a tame Mumford quotient
AlgebraicCurve.Pic0.exists_torusPoints_uniformization_of_periodDatum_of_mumfordQuotient_of_v_card_stabilizer_eq_one146 below · depth 21 - Equivariance of the period pairing and the theta-pinned uniformisation
AlgebraicCurve.Pic0.periodDatum_equivariant_of_theta_pinned_uniformization_of_mumfordQuotient125 below · depth 21 - Principal theta divisors on a Mumford quotient are periods
AlgebraicCurve.Pic0.exists_prod_theta_eq_period_of_isPrincipal_of_v_card_stabilizer_eq_one138 below · depth 22 - Equal theta multipliers give a principal divisor on a Mumford quotient
AlgebraicCurve.Pic0.isPrincipal_sum_sub_sum_of_prod_theta_eq_of_v_card_stabilizer_eq_one119 below · depth 22 - Galois transport of a theta-pinned Mumford torus point
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.exists_monoidHom_theta_coeffMap_precomp_apply_eq_of_apply_eq8 below · depth 22 - Pinned theta multipliers exist for every pair of points
CerednikDrinfeld.Mumford.exists_theta_multiplier_and_torusPoint_apply_eq_of_mumfordQuotient49 below · depth 22 - Semilinear automorphism realised by (n,t) transports places accordingly
CerednikDrinfeld.Omega.semilinearAut_smul_pt_eq_pt_smul_of_mem_toValuationSubring_iff1 below · depth 22