Last updated: 2018-05-15

workflowr checks: (Click a bullet for more information)
  • R Markdown file: up-to-date

    Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.

  • Environment: empty

    Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.

  • Seed: set.seed(12345)

    The command set.seed(12345) was run prior to running the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are reproducible.

  • Session information: recorded

    Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.

  • Repository version: 388e65e

    Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility. The version displayed above was the version of the Git repository at the time these results were generated.

    Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:
    
    Ignored files:
        Ignored:    .DS_Store
        Ignored:    .Rhistory
        Ignored:    .Rproj.user/
        Ignored:    analysis/.DS_Store
        Ignored:    analysis/BH_robustness_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/FDR_Null_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/FDR_null_betahat_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/Rmosek_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/StepDown_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/alternative2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/alternative_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/ash_gd_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/average_cor_gtex_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/average_cor_gtex_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/brca_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_deconv_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_fdr_1_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_fdr_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_fdr_3_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_fdr_4_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_fdr_5_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_fdr_6_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_plots_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_sim_1_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_sim_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_sim_3_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_sim_4_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_sim_5_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_sim_6_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cash_sim_7_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/correlated_z_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/correlated_z_3_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/correlated_z_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/create_null_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/cutoff_null_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/design_matrix_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/design_matrix_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/diagnostic_ash_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/diagnostic_correlated_z_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/diagnostic_correlated_z_3_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/diagnostic_correlated_z_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/diagnostic_plot_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/diagnostic_plot_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/efron_leukemia_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/fitting_normal_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/gaussian_derivatives_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/gaussian_derivatives_3_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/gaussian_derivatives_4_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/gaussian_derivatives_5_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/gaussian_derivatives_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/gd-ash_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/gd_delta_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/gd_lik_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/gd_lik_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/gd_w_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/knockoff_10_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/knockoff_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/knockoff_3_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/knockoff_4_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/knockoff_5_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/knockoff_6_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/knockoff_7_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/knockoff_8_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/knockoff_9_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/knockoff_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/knockoff_var_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/marginal_z_alternative_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/marginal_z_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/mosek_reg_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/mosek_reg_4_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/mosek_reg_5_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/mosek_reg_6_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/mosek_reg_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/pihat0_null_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/plot_diagnostic_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/poster_obayes17_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/real_data_simulation_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/real_data_simulation_3_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/real_data_simulation_4_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/real_data_simulation_5_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/real_data_simulation_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/rmosek_primal_dual_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/rmosek_primal_dual_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/seqgendiff_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/simulated_correlated_null_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/simulated_correlated_null_3_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/simulated_correlated_null_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/simulation_real_se_2_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/simulation_real_se_cache/
        Ignored:    analysis/smemo_2_cache/
        Ignored:    data/LSI/
        Ignored:    docs/.DS_Store
        Ignored:    docs/figure/.DS_Store
        Ignored:    output/fig/
    
    
    Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
Expand here to see past versions:
    File Version Author Date Message
    html e05bc83 LSun 2018-05-12 Update to 1.0
    rmd cc0ab83 Lei Sun 2018-05-11 update
    html 4b179a9 LSun 2018-04-05 Build site.
    rmd 20ea328 LSun 2018-04-05 wflow_publish(c(“analysis/knockoff_7.rmd”, “analysis/knockoff_8.rmd”,
    html f4c819a LSun 2018-03-01 Build site.
    rmd ed7a1a0 LSun 2018-03-01 wflow_publish(“knockoff_7.rmd”)
    rmd b2e3718 Lei Sun 2018-02-28 randomization
    html 1d0f7e0 LSun 2018-02-28 Build site.
    rmd 4eaee81 LSun 2018-02-28 wflow_publish(“knockoff_7.rmd”)
    html c9714a8 LSun 2018-02-23 Build site.
    rmd 4b4505a LSun 2018-02-23 wflow_publish(c(“knockoff_7.rmd”, “index.rmd”))
    html 3b0b20d LSun 2018-02-23 Build site.
    rmd 2f0b137 LSun 2018-02-23 wflow_publish(“knockoff_7.rmd”)
    html 3fcf815 LSun 2018-02-23 Build site.
    rmd ef61de6 Lei Sun 2018-02-21 knockoff
    rmd 18479f8 LSun 2018-02-21 knockoff

Introduction

Knockoff has 3 steps.

  1. Generate knockoff variables, which keep the same correlation structure as original variables but has no effect on the response.

  2. Generate test statistics such that these statistics tend to be large positive number for non-null variables but iid positive or negative for null variables.

  3. Find a cutoff threshold for those test statistics to control the estimated FDR under \(q\).

The default knockoff::knockoff.filter function uses SDP construction in step 1 and LASSO-related statistics in step 2. However, we’ve found that Knockoff coded in this way failed to control FDR in simulations when variables are generated such that \(\hat\beta\) has heavy average absolute pairwise correlation, which seems to contradict Theorem 2 in the Knockoff paper. Now we take a closer look to see what went wrong.

In step 1, we use two construction methods: equi and sdp. sdp is believed to be more powerful. In step 2, we use two statistics: marginal and lasso-related. lasso-related is believed to be more powerful.

n <- 3e3
p <- 1e3
k <- 50
d <- 7
q <- 0.1

Fixed \(X\) Knockoffs: 1000 simulation trials

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-5-1.png:
Version Author Date
3fcf815 LSun 2018-02-23

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-6-1.png:
Version Author Date
3fcf815 LSun 2018-02-23

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-6-2.png:
Version Author Date
3b0b20d LSun 2018-02-23

Model \(X\) Knockoffs: 1000 simulation trials

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-9-1.png:
Version Author Date
1d0f7e0 LSun 2018-02-28
3fcf815 LSun 2018-02-23

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-10-1.png:
Version Author Date
1d0f7e0 LSun 2018-02-28
3fcf815 LSun 2018-02-23

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-11-1.png:
Version Author Date
1d0f7e0 LSun 2018-02-28
3b0b20d LSun 2018-02-23

Observation

A set of well-bahaving Knockoff variables \(X^k\) should have the property that \[ \begin{array}{c} cor(X^k_i, X^k_j) = cor(X_i, X_j)\\ cor(X_i, X^k_j) = cor(X_i, X_j) \end{array} \] while \(cor(X_i, X^k_i)\) should be as small as possible. It turns out it’s just not that easy to generate these well-behaving Knockoff variables when columns in \(X\) are correlated in a certain way. Especially when using SDP optimization, it could generate a lot of knockoffs that are exactly the same as the originals.

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-12-1.png:
Version Author Date
f4c819a LSun 2018-03-01

If an original variable and its knockoff are too similar, it essentially makes little difference which one is included in the model, from a goodness of fit point of view.

The problem becomes more severe when we fit models like LASSO using methods like coordinate descent. The result depends in large part on the sequence of variables getting into the model. So if we feed LASSO with cbind(X, Xk), for every iteration, it’s always X[j] being optimized before Xk[j]. That’s a major reason we see asymmetric test statistics as above, and why Knockoff loses FDR control in these circumstances.

One way to fix that is to randomize the order of variables in cbind(X, Xk) before feeding them to LASSO. The following is a simulation.

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-14-1.png:
Version Author Date
f4c819a LSun 2018-03-01

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-14-2.png:
Version Author Date
f4c819a LSun 2018-03-01

Expand here to see past versions of unnamed-chunk-14-3.png:
Version Author Date
f4c819a LSun 2018-03-01

After column randomization, the test statistcs for null variables are back to normal and Knockoff controls FDR again. The low power is another issue.

Session information

sessionInfo()
R version 3.4.3 (2017-11-30)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.4

Matrix products: default
BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.4/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.4/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib

locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8

attached base packages:
[1] parallel  stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods  
[8] base     

other attached packages:
[1] lattice_0.20-35 doMC_1.3.5      iterators_1.0.9 foreach_1.4.4  
[5] ggplot2_2.2.1   reshape2_1.4.3  knockoff_0.3.0 

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
 [1] Rcpp_0.12.16      RSpectra_0.12-0   compiler_3.4.3   
 [4] pillar_1.0.1      git2r_0.21.0      plyr_1.8.4       
 [7] workflowr_1.0.1   R.methodsS3_1.7.1 R.utils_2.6.0    
[10] tools_3.4.3       digest_0.6.15     evaluate_0.10.1  
[13] tibble_1.4.1      gtable_0.2.0      rlang_0.1.6      
[16] Matrix_1.2-12     yaml_2.1.18       stringr_1.3.0    
[19] knitr_1.20        rprojroot_1.3-2   grid_3.4.3       
[22] rmarkdown_1.9     Rdsdp_1.0.4-2     magrittr_1.5     
[25] whisker_0.3-2     backports_1.1.2   scales_0.5.0     
[28] codetools_0.2-15  htmltools_0.3.6   colorspace_1.3-2 
[31] labeling_0.3      stringi_1.1.6     lazyeval_0.2.1   
[34] munsell_0.4.3     R.oo_1.21.0      

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr 1.0.1