Last updated: 2018-05-15
workflowr checks: (Click a bullet for more information) ✔ R Markdown file: up-to-date
Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.
✔ Environment: empty
Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.
✔ Seed:
set.seed(12345)
The command set.seed(12345)
was run prior to running the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are reproducible.
✔ Session information: recorded
Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.
✔ Repository version: 388e65e
wflow_publish
or wflow_git_commit
). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:
Ignored files:
Ignored: .DS_Store
Ignored: .Rhistory
Ignored: .Rproj.user/
Ignored: analysis/.DS_Store
Ignored: analysis/BH_robustness_cache/
Ignored: analysis/FDR_Null_cache/
Ignored: analysis/FDR_null_betahat_cache/
Ignored: analysis/Rmosek_cache/
Ignored: analysis/StepDown_cache/
Ignored: analysis/alternative2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/alternative_cache/
Ignored: analysis/ash_gd_cache/
Ignored: analysis/average_cor_gtex_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/average_cor_gtex_cache/
Ignored: analysis/brca_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_deconv_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_fdr_1_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_fdr_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_fdr_3_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_fdr_4_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_fdr_5_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_fdr_6_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_plots_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_sim_1_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_sim_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_sim_3_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_sim_4_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_sim_5_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_sim_6_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cash_sim_7_cache/
Ignored: analysis/correlated_z_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/correlated_z_3_cache/
Ignored: analysis/correlated_z_cache/
Ignored: analysis/create_null_cache/
Ignored: analysis/cutoff_null_cache/
Ignored: analysis/design_matrix_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/design_matrix_cache/
Ignored: analysis/diagnostic_ash_cache/
Ignored: analysis/diagnostic_correlated_z_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/diagnostic_correlated_z_3_cache/
Ignored: analysis/diagnostic_correlated_z_cache/
Ignored: analysis/diagnostic_plot_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/diagnostic_plot_cache/
Ignored: analysis/efron_leukemia_cache/
Ignored: analysis/fitting_normal_cache/
Ignored: analysis/gaussian_derivatives_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/gaussian_derivatives_3_cache/
Ignored: analysis/gaussian_derivatives_4_cache/
Ignored: analysis/gaussian_derivatives_5_cache/
Ignored: analysis/gaussian_derivatives_cache/
Ignored: analysis/gd-ash_cache/
Ignored: analysis/gd_delta_cache/
Ignored: analysis/gd_lik_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/gd_lik_cache/
Ignored: analysis/gd_w_cache/
Ignored: analysis/knockoff_10_cache/
Ignored: analysis/knockoff_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/knockoff_3_cache/
Ignored: analysis/knockoff_4_cache/
Ignored: analysis/knockoff_5_cache/
Ignored: analysis/knockoff_6_cache/
Ignored: analysis/knockoff_7_cache/
Ignored: analysis/knockoff_8_cache/
Ignored: analysis/knockoff_9_cache/
Ignored: analysis/knockoff_cache/
Ignored: analysis/knockoff_var_cache/
Ignored: analysis/marginal_z_alternative_cache/
Ignored: analysis/marginal_z_cache/
Ignored: analysis/mosek_reg_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/mosek_reg_4_cache/
Ignored: analysis/mosek_reg_5_cache/
Ignored: analysis/mosek_reg_6_cache/
Ignored: analysis/mosek_reg_cache/
Ignored: analysis/pihat0_null_cache/
Ignored: analysis/plot_diagnostic_cache/
Ignored: analysis/poster_obayes17_cache/
Ignored: analysis/real_data_simulation_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/real_data_simulation_3_cache/
Ignored: analysis/real_data_simulation_4_cache/
Ignored: analysis/real_data_simulation_5_cache/
Ignored: analysis/real_data_simulation_cache/
Ignored: analysis/rmosek_primal_dual_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/rmosek_primal_dual_cache/
Ignored: analysis/seqgendiff_cache/
Ignored: analysis/simulated_correlated_null_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/simulated_correlated_null_3_cache/
Ignored: analysis/simulated_correlated_null_cache/
Ignored: analysis/simulation_real_se_2_cache/
Ignored: analysis/simulation_real_se_cache/
Ignored: analysis/smemo_2_cache/
Ignored: data/LSI/
Ignored: docs/.DS_Store
Ignored: docs/figure/.DS_Store
Ignored: output/fig/
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
File | Version | Author | Date | Message |
---|---|---|---|---|
html | e05bc83 | LSun | 2018-05-12 | Update to 1.0 |
rmd | cc0ab83 | Lei Sun | 2018-05-11 | update |
html | 0f36d99 | LSun | 2017-12-21 | Build site. |
html | 853a484 | LSun | 2017-11-07 | Build site. |
html | 0214a4b | LSun | 2017-06-16 | data transfer |
html | b141020 | LSun | 2017-05-09 | writeups |
rmd | 615c317 | LSun | 2017-05-09 | marginal non-null |
We’ve seen that when generated from the global null, that is, when the cases and controls have no difference, the \(z\) scores’ behavior are what one would expect if simulated from correlated marginally \(N\left(0, 1\right)\) random variables.
But what if the \(z\) scores are not simulated from the global null? Are these \(z\) scores going to behave significantly different from correlated marginally \(N\left(0, 1\right)\) random samples? Let’s take a look at the real data containing true effects.
library(limma)
library(edgeR)
library(qvalue)
library(ashr)
#extract top g genes from G by n matrix X of expression
top_genes_index = function (g, X)
{return(order(rowSums(X), decreasing = TRUE)[1 : g])
}
lcpm = function (r) {
R = colSums(r)
t(log2(((t(r) + 0.5) / (R + 1)) * 10^6))
}
# transform counts to z scores
# these z scores are marginally N(0, 1) under null
counts_to_z = function (counts, condition) {
design = model.matrix(~condition)
dgecounts = calcNormFactors(DGEList(counts = counts, group = condition))
v = voom(dgecounts, design, plot = FALSE)
lim = lmFit(v)
r.ebayes = eBayes(lim)
p = r.ebayes$p.value[, 2]
t = r.ebayes$t[, 2]
z = sign(t) * qnorm(1 - p/2)
return (z)
}
For convenience and without loss of generality, we are using the liver tissue as an anchor in the simulation, and always choose top expressed genes in livers.
r.liver = read.csv("../data/liver.csv")
r.liver = r.liver[, -(1 : 2)] # remove gene name and description
Y = lcpm(r.liver)
G = 1e4
subset = top_genes_index(G, Y)
r.liver = r.liver[subset, ]
tissue = "heart"
r = read.csv(paste0("../data/", tissue, ".csv"))
r = r[, -(1 : 2)] # remove gene name and description
## choose top expressed genes in liver
r = r[subset, ]
set.seed(777)
m = 1e3
n = 5
z.list = list()
condition = c(rep(0, n), rep(1, n))
for (i in 1 : m) {
counts = cbind(r.liver[, sample(1 : ncol(r.liver), n)],
r[, sample(1 : ncol(r), n)])
z.list[[i]] = counts_to_z(counts, condition)
}
z.mat = matrix(unlist(z.list), nrow = m, byrow = TRUE)
saveRDS(z.mat, "../output/z_5liver_5heart_777.rds")
tissue = "muscle"
r = read.csv(paste0("../data/", tissue, ".csv"))
r = r[, -(1 : 2)] # remove gene name and description
## choose top expressed genes in liver
r = r[subset, ]
set.seed(777)
m = 1e3
n = 5
z.list = list()
condition = c(rep(0, n), rep(1, n))
for (i in 1 : m) {
counts = cbind(r.liver[, sample(1 : ncol(r.liver), n)],
r[, sample(1 : ncol(r), n)])
z.list[[i]] = counts_to_z(counts, condition)
}
z.mat = matrix(unlist(z.list), nrow = m, byrow = TRUE)
saveRDS(z.mat, "../output/z_5liver_5muscle_777.rds")
z.heart = readRDS("../output/z_5liver_5heart_777.rds")
n = ncol(z.heart)
m = nrow(z.heart)
z.muscle = readRDS("../output/z_5liver_5muscle_777.rds")
n = ncol(z.muscle)
m = nrow(z.muscle)
As expected, the empirical distribution and the indicated marginal distribution of the correlated non-null \(z\) scores are starkly different from those of the correlated null ones.
Particular interesting are the column-wise plots. The distribution of the number of tail observations is not only not close to normal, not close to what would be expected under correlated marginally \(N\left(0, 1\right)\), but also not even unimodal, not even peaked at \(m\alpha\) when \(\alpha \leq0.5\) or \(m\left(1-\alpha\right)\) when \(\alpha\geq0.5\). It suggests that there are indeed plenty of true signals, which make the marginal distribution of the \(z\) scores for a certain gene often not centered at \(0\).
sessionInfo()
R version 3.4.3 (2017-11-30)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.4
Matrix products: default
BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.4/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.4/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
other attached packages:
[1] ashr_2.2-2 qvalue_2.10.0 edgeR_3.20.2 limma_3.34.4
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] Rcpp_0.12.16 compiler_3.4.3 pillar_1.0.1
[4] git2r_0.21.0 plyr_1.8.4 workflowr_1.0.1
[7] iterators_1.0.9 R.methodsS3_1.7.1 R.utils_2.6.0
[10] tools_3.4.3 digest_0.6.15 evaluate_0.10.1
[13] tibble_1.4.1 gtable_0.2.0 lattice_0.20-35
[16] rlang_0.1.6 foreach_1.4.4 Matrix_1.2-12
[19] parallel_3.4.3 yaml_2.1.18 stringr_1.3.0
[22] knitr_1.20 locfit_1.5-9.1 rprojroot_1.3-2
[25] grid_3.4.3 rmarkdown_1.9 ggplot2_2.2.1
[28] reshape2_1.4.3 magrittr_1.5 whisker_0.3-2
[31] MASS_7.3-47 codetools_0.2-15 backports_1.1.2
[34] scales_0.5.0 htmltools_0.3.6 splines_3.4.3
[37] colorspace_1.3-2 stringi_1.1.6 pscl_1.5.2
[40] lazyeval_0.2.1 munsell_0.4.3 doParallel_1.0.11
[43] truncnorm_1.0-7 SQUAREM_2017.10-1 R.oo_1.21.0
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr 1.0.1